IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p382-d1347378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Substrate Comparison for Tomato Propagation under Different Fertigation Protocols

Author

Listed:
  • Milon Chowdhury

    (Agricultural Technical Institute, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)

  • Alexandra Espinoza-Ayala

    (Agricultural Technical Institute, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)

  • Uttara C. Samarakoon

    (Agricultural Technical Institute, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)

  • James E. Altland

    (USDA Agricultural Research Service, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)

  • Teng Yang

    (Agricultural Technical Institute, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
    Current address: School of Applied and Interdisciplinary Studies, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS 66506, USA.)

Abstract

Greenhouse tomato production faces multiple challenges, including the excessive use of nonrenewable substrates that are difficult to dispose of after use. Currently, most growers propagate tomatoes in rockwool, but there is an increasing demand for sustainable media. The objective of this research was to evaluate sustainable and organic alternatives for greenhouse propagation of tomato seedlings intended for high-wire production. Different organic and inorganic substrates were evaluated in three experiments, using a nutrient solution composed of a complete water-soluble fertilizer. Germination and growth parameters, including height, stem diameter, number of leaves, leaf area, foliar chlorophyll levels (SPAD), and shoot fresh and dry weight, were measured. In the first experiment, which employed overhead irrigation, rockwool, coir, wood fiber–coir mix, medium-grade pine bark, pine bark < 0.64 cm, and pine bark < 0.32 cm were evaluated. Tomato germination was faster and achieved higher percentages with pine bark < 0.64 cm compared to other substrates. However, growth performance was similar or better in coir than in rockwool four weeks after transplantation. For the second experiment with sub-irrigation only, rockwool, coir, wood fiber–coir mix, pine bark < 0.32 cm bark, and peat were evaluated at different container heights. Peat resulted in greater growth across all parameters, followed by wood fiber–coir mix in all container heights, while pine bark had the least growth across all measured parameters. In the third experiment with overhead irrigation, rockwool, wood fiber–coir mix, pine bark < 0.32 cm, and a commercial peat-based mixture were evaluated under different fertilizer rates (electrical conductivity of 1.1 and 2.2 mS·cm −1 ). Wood fiber–coir mix, peat-based mix, and rockwool were the substrates with the highest values for all evaluated parameters. While all the organic substrates showed potential for use in tomato propagation, pine bark < 0.32 cm bark and wood fiber–coir mix provided the best media for germination. Peat and wood fiber–coir mix showed the best media for subsequent seedling growth and demonstrated potential to be used as substitutes for rockwool.

Suggested Citation

  • Milon Chowdhury & Alexandra Espinoza-Ayala & Uttara C. Samarakoon & James E. Altland & Teng Yang, 2024. "Substrate Comparison for Tomato Propagation under Different Fertigation Protocols," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:382-:d:1347378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/382/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/382/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Dubský & F. Šrámek, 2009. "The effect of rockwool on physical properties of growing substrates for perennials 38," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 36(1), pages 38-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengyang Zheng & Chenzhe Wang & Jing Ju & Qigen Dai & Haitao Zhao & Ping Liu & Xin Wang, 2023. "Is Rockwool Potentially Harmful to the Soil Environment as a Nursery Substrate? Taking Eisenia fetida as an Example for Toxicological Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:382-:d:1347378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.