Author
Listed:
- Liwan Wang
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Ruirui Zhang
(Research Center of Intelligent Equipment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Linhuan Zhang
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Research Center of Intelligent Equipment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Tongchuan Yi
(Research Center of Intelligent Equipment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Danzhu Zhang
(Research Center of Intelligent Equipment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Aobin Zhu
(Research Center of Intelligent Equipment, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
Abstract
In consideration of the limited accuracy of individual tree canopy segmentation algorithms due to the diverse canopy structure and complex environments in mountainous and hilly areas, this study optimized the segmentation parameters of three algorithms for individual tree canopy segmentation of Camellia oleifera in such environments by analyzing their respective parameters. Utilizing an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Light Detecting and Ranging (UAV-LiDAR) system, we obtained Canopy Height Models (CHM) of Camellia oleifera canopies based on Digital Elevation Models (DEM) and Digital Surface Models (DSM). Subsequently, we investigated the effects of CHM segmentation, point cloud clustering segmentation, and layer stacking fitting segmentation on Camellia oleifera canopies across different research areas. Additionally, combining ground survey data from forest lands with visual interpretation of UAV orthophoto images, we evaluated the performance of these three segmentation algorithms in terms of the F-score as an evaluation indicator for individual tree canopy segmentation accuracy. Combined with the Cloth Simulation Filter (CSF) filtering algorithm after removing the ground point cloud, our findings indicate that among different camellia densities and terrain environments, the point cloud clustering segmentation algorithm achieved the highest segmentation accuracy at 93%, followed by CHM segmentation at 88% and the layer stacking fitting segmentation method at 84%. By analyzing the data from UAV-LiDAR technology involving various land and Camellia oleifera planting types, we verified the applicability of these three segmentation algorithms for extracting camellia canopies. In conclusion, this study holds significant importance for accurately delineating camellia canopies within mountainous hilly environments while providing valuable insights for further research in related fields.
Suggested Citation
Liwan Wang & Ruirui Zhang & Linhuan Zhang & Tongchuan Yi & Danzhu Zhang & Aobin Zhu, 2024.
"Research on Individual Tree Canopy Segmentation of Camellia oleifera Based on a UAV-LiDAR System,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:364-:d:1345161
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:364-:d:1345161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.