Author
Listed:
- Laura Costa Oliveira Almeida
(Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
- Hariane Luiz Santos
(Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
- Carlos Henrique de Castro Nogueira
(Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
- Melina Rodrigues Alves Carnietto
(Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
- Gustavo Ferreira da Silva
(Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
- Carmen Sílvia Fernandes Boaro
(Biodiversity and Biostatistics Department, Institute of Biosciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
- Marcelo de Almeida Silva
(Laboratory of Ecophysiology Applied to Agriculture (LECA), School of Agricultural Sciences, UNESP—São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18610-034, SP, Brazil)
Abstract
Sugarcane plays a crucial role in global sugar and ethanol production. Conventionally, sugarcane propagation involves planting billets. However, Brazilian researchers have introduced the innovative pre-sprouted seedlings (PSS) method, widely used in the MEIOSI (Simultaneously Occurring Interrotational Method) system. Although PSS has several advantages over the conventional method, its sensitivity to water scarcity is a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the survival and growth of PSS inoculated with Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis (PGPB) under different water regimes. The experiment was conducted in the field in a randomized block in strips (split-block) using a 2 × 4 factorial scheme consisting of two inoculation conditions (with and without PGPB) and four water regimes (WR) (0%, 33%, 66%, and 100% of the ideal irrigation). PGPB increased PSS survival (4.17%) and water use efficiency (185.10% under the 0% WR). In addition, inoculation increased root (12.5%, 7.7%, and 16.2% for surface area, area projection, and root volume, respectively) and shoot growth. PGPB also increased nutrient uptake, such as N (60.8% and 18.3% under 0% and 66% WR), P (on average 11.7%), Mn (27.6% and 28.7% under 66% and 100% WR), Zn (111.4% under 0% WR), and Cu accumulation (27.17%), which provided a higher number of stalks per meter and, therefore, a higher multiplication rate in the MEIOSI system. Inoculation proved to be a promising alternative for PSS establishing under water restriction.
Suggested Citation
Laura Costa Oliveira Almeida & Hariane Luiz Santos & Carlos Henrique de Castro Nogueira & Melina Rodrigues Alves Carnietto & Gustavo Ferreira da Silva & Carmen Sílvia Fernandes Boaro & Marcelo de Alme, 2024.
"Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Enhance Survival, Growth, and Nutritional Content of Sugarcane Propagated through Pre-Sprouted Seedlings under Water Deficit,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:189-:d:1327029
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:189-:d:1327029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.