Author
Listed:
- Vicky Garcia Rodriguez
(Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada)
- Layton Vandestroet
(Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada)
- Vinura C. Abeysekara
(Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada)
- Kim Ominski
(Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)
- Emmanuel W. Bumunang
(Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada)
- Tim McAllister
(Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge Research and Development Center, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada)
- Stephanie Terry
(Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge Research and Development Center, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada)
- Luis Alberto Miranda-Romero
(Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico)
- Kim Stanford
(Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4, Canada)
Abstract
In Canada, approximately 11.2 million metric tons of avoidable food waste (FW) is produced per year. Preservation of a greater proportion of this FW for use as livestock feed would have significant environmental and socioeconomic benefits. Therefore, this study blended discarded fruits, vegetables, and bakery products from grocery stores into silage to assess the ability to preserve their nutritional value and contribute to the feed supply. Two treatments for reducing the water content of FW were evaluated, sun-dried (SD) and passive-dried (PD), and compared to control (C) using laboratory mini-silos over 60 days of ensiling. Although dry matter (DM) was increased by 1–5% for PD and SD, respectively, up to 41.9% of bread products were required to produce a targeted silage DM of 38%. All mature silages were high in crude protein (15.2 to 15.7%), crude fat (6.0 to 6.3%), sodium (0.48 to 0.52%), and sugars (0.95 to 1.53%) and were low in neutral detergent fiber (6.2 to 7.6%) as compared to traditional silages used as livestock feed. Mold and other signs of spoilage were visible on FW, but mycophenolic acid was the only mycotoxin above the limit of detection in material prior to ensiling. Plate counts of molds and yeasts declined ( p < 0.001) by 5–7 log colony-forming units (CFU) over 60 days of fermentation and were not detected in mature silage. All silages were aerobically stable over 20 days. This study indicates that FW can produce good-quality silage but approaches other than SD and PD are required for increasing silage DM as insufficient bread products may be available for this purpose in all batches of FW.
Suggested Citation
Vicky Garcia Rodriguez & Layton Vandestroet & Vinura C. Abeysekara & Kim Ominski & Emmanuel W. Bumunang & Tim McAllister & Stephanie Terry & Luis Alberto Miranda-Romero & Kim Stanford, 2024.
"Optimizing Silage Strategies for Sustainable Livestock Feed: Preserving Retail Food Waste,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:122-:d:1318830
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:122-:d:1318830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.