Author
Listed:
- Zhida Zhao
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Qunhao Niu
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Tianyi Wu
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Feng Liu
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Zezhao Wang
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Huijiang Gao
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Junya Li
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
- Bo Zhu
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Northern Agriculture and Livestock Husbandry Technology Innovation Center, Hohhot 010010, China)
- Lingyang Xu
(State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)
Abstract
Leveraging whole-genome sequencing (WGS) that includes the full spectrum of genetic variation provides a better understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in the economically important traits of farm animals. However, the effectiveness of WGS in improving the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) is limited. Recent genetic analyses of complex traits, such as genome-wide association study (GWAS), have identified numerous genomic regions and potential genes, which can provide valuable prior information for the improvement of genomic selection (GS). In this study, we applied different genome prediction methods to integrate GWAS results and gene feature annotations, which significantly improved the accuracy of GS for beef production traits. The Bayesian models incorporating genomic features showed the highest prediction accuracy, particularly for average daily gain (ADG) and bone weight (BW). Compared to prediction models based on WGS data, GP including biological prior can optimize the prediction accuracy by up to 11.56% for ADG and 14.60% for BW. Also, GP using GBLUP and Bayesian methods integrating biological priors for single-trait GWAS can significantly increase the prediction accuracy. Bayesian methods generally outperformed GBLUP models, with average improvements of 2.25% for ADG, 5.04% for BW, and 3.44% for live weight (LW). Our results indicate that leveraging biological prior knowledge can significantly refine GS models and underline the potential of combining WGS data with biological prior knowledge to further enhance the breeding process.
Suggested Citation
Zhida Zhao & Qunhao Niu & Tianyi Wu & Feng Liu & Zezhao Wang & Huijiang Gao & Junya Li & Bo Zhu & Lingyang Xu, 2024.
"Comparative Analysis of Genomic Prediction for Production Traits Using Genomic Annotation and a Genome-Wide Association Study at Sequencing Levels in Beef Cattle,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2255-:d:1540326
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2255-:d:1540326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.