IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2254-d1540314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Nutritional Regimes in a Tomato Soilless System Affect the Bacterial Communities with Consequences on the Crop Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Luciano Beneduce

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy)

  • Federica Piergiacomo

    (Department of Agriculture, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering (DAFNE), University of Foggia, Via Napoli 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy
    Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, Piazza Università 1, 39100 Bolzano-Bozen, Italy)

  • Kalina Sikorska-Zimny

    (Fruit and Vegetables Storage and Processing Department, Division of Fruit and Vegetable Storage and Postharvest Physiology, The Institute of Horticulture—National Research Institute, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3 Str., 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of different nutritional regimes on the bacterial communities within the root-growing substrate of a soilless tomato production system and the effects on crop quality. The experiment was conducted with two tomato varieties, Conchita and Sweetelle, under three nutritional treatments: standard, nutrient solution with 20% increased salts and nitrogen and supplementation with the biostimulant Bio-algeen S-90. Bacterial communities in the root substrate were influenced by both the tomato variety and the nutritional regime. Sweetelle exhibited more pronounced shifts in bacterial communities compared to Conchita. An overall increase in bacterial populations with time was observed (+0.38 Log). Specifically, the 20% enhanced nutrient solution had varying effects on bacterial counts in the two tomato varieties, while the biostimulant promoted an increase in ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (+0.4 Log). Microbial community analysis highlighted the distinct impact of each nutritional regime on nitrogen-cycling bacteria, which correlated with differences in quality parameters such as the L-ascorbic acid and lycopene contents. In the first case, a decrease (25–30%) was observed, while the lycopene content decreased after harvest (−51% in Conchita variety) but was more stable in the postharvest phase (66–70% lycopene retained, only 44% in the control). This study highlights how increased sources of nutrients and the differential responses of microbial communities to nutritional regimes do not necessarily increase the crop quality and that tailored approaches are required for different tomato varieties.

Suggested Citation

  • Luciano Beneduce & Federica Piergiacomo & Kalina Sikorska-Zimny, 2024. "Different Nutritional Regimes in a Tomato Soilless System Affect the Bacterial Communities with Consequences on the Crop Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2254-:d:1540314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2254-:d:1540314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.