Author
Listed:
- Guangfu Gao
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
- Shanxin Zhang
(School of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Jianing Shen
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
- Kailong Hu
(Key Laboratory of Emergency Satellite Engineering and Application, Ministry of Emergency Management, Beijing 100124, China)
- Jia Tian
(School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China)
- Yihan Yao
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
- Qingjiu Tian
(International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)
- Yuanyuan Fu
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
- Haikuan Feng
(Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China)
- Yang Liu
(Key Laboratory of Quantitative Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
Key Lab of Smart Agriculture System, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Jibo Yue
(College of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
Abstract
Conservation tillage involves covering the soil surface with crop residues after harvest, typically through reduced or no-tillage practices. This approach increases the soil organic matter, improves the soil structure, prevents erosion, reduces water loss, promotes microbial activity, and enhances root development. Therefore, accurate information on crop residue coverage is critical for monitoring the implementation of conservation tillage practices. This study collected “crop–crop residues–soil” images from wheat-soybean rotation fields using mobile phones to create calibration, validation, and independent validation datasets. We developed a deep learning model named crop–crop residue–soil segmentation network (CCRSNet) to enhance the performance of cropland “crop–crop residues–soil” image segmentation and proportion extraction. The model enhances the segmentation accuracy and proportion extraction by extracting and integrating shallow and deep image features and attention modules to capture multi-scale contextual information. Our findings indicated that (1) lightweight models outperformed deeper networks for “crop–crop residues–soil” image segmentation. When CCRSNet employed a deep network backbone (ResNet50), its feature extraction capability was inferior to that of lighter models (VGG16). (2) CCRSNet models that integrated shallow and deep features with attention modules achieved a high segmentation and proportion extraction performance. Using VGG16 as the backbone, CCRSNet achieved an mIoU of 92.73% and a PA of 96.23% in the independent validation dataset, surpassing traditional SVM and RF models. The RMSE for the proportion extraction accuracy ranged from 1.05% to 3.56%. These results demonstrate the potential of CCRSNet for the accurate, rapid, and low-cost detection of crop residue coverage. However, the generalizability and robustness of deep learning models depend on the diversity of calibration datasets. Further experiments across different regions and crops are required to validate this method’s accuracy and applicability for “crop–crop residues–soil” image segmentation and proportion extraction.
Suggested Citation
Guangfu Gao & Shanxin Zhang & Jianing Shen & Kailong Hu & Jia Tian & Yihan Yao & Qingjiu Tian & Yuanyuan Fu & Haikuan Feng & Yang Liu & Jibo Yue, 2024.
"Segmentation and Proportion Extraction of Crop, Crop Residues, and Soil Using Digital Images and Deep Learning,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2240-:d:1538568
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2240-:d:1538568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.