IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2207-d1535548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Different Cereal Rye Seeding Rates, Cotton Seeding Rates, Planter Type, and Working Speeds on No-Till Cotton

Author

Listed:
  • Ted S. Kornecki

    (USDA-ARS, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, 411 S. Donahue Dr., Auburn, AL 36832, USA)

  • Corey M. Kichler

    (USDA-ARS, National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, 411 S. Donahue Dr., Auburn, AL 36832, USA)

Abstract

No-till cotton producers are focused on saving resources by reducing planting rates, while maintaining yields. A 3-year field experiment was conducted in Shorter, Alabama, USA, to evaluate cotton planted into a roll/crimped cereal rye cover crop seeded at rates of 50 and 101 kg ha −1 . Cotton planter performance was also compared between a mechanical planter and an electronic planter at speeds of 5.6 and 11.2 km h −1 along with low and high cotton planting rates (90,193 and 180,387 seeds ha −1 ). Results indicate that cereal rye seeding rates did not affect its biomass. The emergence rate index (ERI) was influenced by the planter type at the 5.6 km h −1 speed with a higher ERI (9.70% day −1 ) for the mechanical planter compared to a lower ERI (9.05% day −1 ) for the electronic planter. The cotton population was proportional to planting rates generating 66,650 and 114,178 plants ha −1 at low and high rates. Standard deviation (STD) of cotton plant spacing had a lower STD for the electronic planter compared to the mechanical planter, but did not affect the cotton yield. The seed cotton yield was not dependent on the cover crop seeding rate, planter type, and speed, but differed among years. Drought in 2019 caused a yield reduction (1844 kg ha −1 ) compared to higher yields of 3981 kg ha −1 in 2018 and 4152 kg ha −1 in 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Ted S. Kornecki & Corey M. Kichler, 2024. "Effects of Different Cereal Rye Seeding Rates, Cotton Seeding Rates, Planter Type, and Working Speeds on No-Till Cotton," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2207-:d:1535548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2207-:d:1535548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.