IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2103-d1526224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusion of Hybrid Pennisetum and Probiotics Enhanced Anaerobic Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Alfalfa Silage

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Tang

    (College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jue Li

    (College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xuelin Han

    (College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Jie Qiao

    (College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Shuangshuang Bu

    (College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Xiaoping Xie

    (College of JunCao Science and Ecology (College of Carbon Neutrality), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Xin Li

    (College of JunCao Science and Ecology (College of Carbon Neutrality), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Jing Zhou

    (College of JunCao Science and Ecology (College of Carbon Neutrality), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Fulin Yang

    (College of Animal Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

This study aims to assess the impact of Bacillus subtilis (BS) and Lactobacillus buchneri (LB) on the fermentation quality, microbial communities, and predicted metabolic pathways in mixed silage made from alfalfa and hybrid Pennisetum . We prepared mixed silage from fresh alfalfa and hybrid Pennisetum in a 1:1 ratio and inoculated it with BS, LB, or a combination of both (BSLB) or left it untreated as a control. The silage was fermented for 30 and 60 days. The results showed that inoculation with BS, LB, or their combination increased the lactic acid and crude-protein content while reducing the fiber content compared to the control. Additionally, BS and LB inoculation raised ( p < 0.05) the acetic acid content, and the combination of both strains increased ( p < 0.05) the ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid. LB alone and the combined inoculation also increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus during the pre-silage period. Functional analysis through the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) revealed considerable variations among the different probiotic treatments. The silage process reduced nucleotide metabolism but enhanced carbohydrate, amino acid, energy, cofactor, and vitamin nucleotide metabolism. High-throughput sequencing combined with KEGG functional prediction demonstrated significant differences in community composition and functional changes at 30 and 60 days of fermentation. These findings enhance our understanding of bacterial communities and functional changes in mixed silage of alfalfa and hybrid Pennisetum , offering valuable insights into the fermentation mechanisms of legume and grass silage and informing practices for producing high-quality mixed silage.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Tang & Jue Li & Xuelin Han & Jie Qiao & Shuangshuang Bu & Xiaoping Xie & Xin Li & Jing Zhou & Fulin Yang, 2024. "Inclusion of Hybrid Pennisetum and Probiotics Enhanced Anaerobic Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Diversity of Alfalfa Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2103-:d:1526224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2103-:d:1526224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.