IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i11p2024-d1518157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preharvest Natural Multitoxin Contamination of Winter Wheat Genotypes in Hungary with Special Attention to Aflatoxins and HT-2 Toxin

Author

Listed:
  • Attila Berényi

    (Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Balázs Szabó

    (Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Tamás Meszlényi

    (Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Csaba Vágvölgyi

    (Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Beáta Tóth

    (Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary)

  • Ákos Mesterházy

    (Cereal Research Non-Profit Ltd., 6726 Szeged, Hungary)

Abstract

Toxigenic fungi are among the most significant disease-causing agents in wheat. DON is the most common Fusarium mycotoxin, and for a long time, it was the only toxin researched. However, multitoxin data from wheat samples have drawn attention to the fact that much more toxins can be involved in the wheat toxin story than we supposed earlier. For resistance breeding, we need a more detailed approach to identify toxins that occur above the limit and identify the source of the fungal species that produces them. This study analyzed local wheat varieties for fungal infections and natural multitoxin contamination. Eighteen winter wheat genotypes were tested for fungal contaminations across three different locations in 2021 and 2022. Fourteen different mycotoxins—deoxynivalenol, aflatoxins (B1, B2, G1, and G2), fumonisins (B1 and B2), sterigmatocystin, ochratoxin A, zearalenone, T-2, HT-2, and diacetoxyscirpenol—were analyzed using HPLC/triple-quad MS. Toxigenic species such as Fusarium , Aspergillus , and Penicillium had low rates of occurrence, but the toxin contamination was often surprisingly high. Many samples without corresponding fungal infections were also identified as containing mycotoxins. Therefore, the identified fungal infection is less useful for forecasting toxin level. In conclusion, mycotoxin contamination is decisive. Most samples were contaminated by one or more mycotoxins. Although the mycotoxin concentrations typically remained below EU limits, some samples exhibited higher levels, particularly aflatoxins and Ht-2 toxin. Significant variations were observed across year, location, and genotype. For several toxins, significant genotype differences were identified, supporting the hypothesis that resistance may be a useful and suitable control measure. Stability of toxin contamination across years and locations is a very valuable trait; genotypes were identified with low toxin levels and stability (low variance) to all mycotoxins tested. It seems that, in addition to DON, more attention should be given to aflatoxin B1, B2, and G1, which provided similar concentrations. The HT-2 toxin was present in many samples surpassing EU limits. This is the first report on the dangerous occurrence of preharvest-origin aflatoxins and the HT-2 toxin of wheat in Hungary.

Suggested Citation

  • Attila Berényi & Balázs Szabó & Tamás Meszlényi & Csaba Vágvölgyi & Beáta Tóth & Ákos Mesterházy, 2024. "Preharvest Natural Multitoxin Contamination of Winter Wheat Genotypes in Hungary with Special Attention to Aflatoxins and HT-2 Toxin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:2024-:d:1518157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/11/2024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/11/2024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:2024-:d:1518157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.