IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i11p1976-d1513572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Varying Compaction Levels on Soil Dynamic Properties and the Growth of Canola ( Brassica napus L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Ernest Owusu-Sekyere

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

  • Ying Chen

    (Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

Abstract

Extremely low field emergence rates for canola are primarily attributed to soil compaction from field traffic during and after planting. This study aimed to determine the critical compaction level for canola emergence across different soil types. A laboratory experiment was conducted using sandy loam, silt clay, and clay soils, compacted to five levels (zero to four) using Proctor hammer drops after sowing canola ( Brassica napus L.). The lab results were validated through two years of field experiments in sandy loam, applying four compaction levels (zero to three) using a tractor. Soil properties (bulk density and surface resistance) and canola growth parameters (plant emergence rate, count, height, and above-ground biomass) were measured. Zero compaction resulted in lower bulk density and surface resistance across all soil types. Laboratory results showed maximum emergence rates of 95% for sandy loam, 100% for silt clay, and 60% for clay, while field emergence rates were 63% and 87.59% in the first and second years, respectively, both at zero compaction. Recommendations include light or no compaction for sandy loam, and zero compaction for silt clay, while clay soil did not achieve the 80% emergence target at any compaction level. These results can assist agricultural producers in optimizing their seeding equipment setup and managing field traffic for canola production.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernest Owusu-Sekyere & Ying Chen, 2024. "The Effect of Varying Compaction Levels on Soil Dynamic Properties and the Growth of Canola ( Brassica napus L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:1976-:d:1513572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/11/1976/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/11/1976/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:1976-:d:1513572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.