Author
Listed:
- Siran Wang
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Chenglong Ding
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Jipeng Tian
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Yunhui Cheng
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Nengxiang Xu
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Wenjie Zhang
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Xin Wang
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Mudasir Nazar
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Beiyi Liu
(Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
Key Laboratory for Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the fermentation characteristics, bacterial community structure, co-occurrence networks, and their predicted functionality and pathogenic risk in high-moisture Italian ryegrass (IR; Lolium multiflorum Lam.) silage. The IR harvested at heading stage (208 g dry matter (DM)/kg fresh weight) was spontaneously ensiled in plastic silos (10 L scale). Triplicated silos were opened after 1, 3, 7, 15, 30, and 60 days of fermentation, respectively. The bacterial community structure on days 3 and 60 were investigated using high-throughput sequencing technology, and 16S rRNA-gene predicted functionality and phenotypes were determined by PICRUSt2 and BugBase tools, respectively. After 60 days, the IR silage exhibited good ensiling characteristics indicated by large amounts of acetic acid (~58.7 g/kg DM) and lactic acid (~91.5 g/kg DM), relatively low pH (~4.20), acceptable levels of ammonia nitrogen (~87.0 g/kg total nitrogen), and trace amounts of butyric acid (~1.59 g/kg DM). Psychrobacter was prevalent in fresh IR, and Lactobacillus became the most predominant genus after 3 and 60 days. The ensilage process reduced the complexity of the bacterial community networks in IR silage. The bacterial functional pathways in fresh and ensilaged IR are primarily characterized by the metabolism of carbohydrate and amino acid. The pyruvate kinase and 1-phosphofructokinase were critical in promoting lactic acid fermentation. A greater ( p < 0.01) abundance of the “potentially pathogenic” label was noticed in the bacterial communities of ensiled IR than fresh IR. Altogether, the findings indicated that the high-moisture IR silage exhibited good ensiling characteristics, but the potential for microbial contamination and pathogens still remained after ensiling.
Suggested Citation
Siran Wang & Chenglong Ding & Jipeng Tian & Yunhui Cheng & Nengxiang Xu & Wenjie Zhang & Xin Wang & Mudasir Nazar & Beiyi Liu, 2024.
"Fermentation Profile, Bacterial Community Structure, Co-Occurrence Networks, and Their Predicted Functionality and Pathogenic Risk in High-Moisture Italian Ryegrass Silage,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:1921-:d:1509104
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:11:p:1921-:d:1509104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.