IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i10p1844-d1502167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation Scheme Driven by Science and Technological Innovation—A Study on the Coupling and Coordination of the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation-Economy-Ecology Complex System in the Yangtze River Basin of China

Author

Listed:
  • Chunlin Xiong

    (College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, No. 1, Nongda Road, Furong District, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Yilin Zhang

    (College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, No. 1, Nongda Road, Furong District, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Weijie Wang

    (College of Computer Science and Technology, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China)

Abstract

This study focuses on 19 provinces in the Yangtze River Basin of China. It gathers relevant data indicators from 2010 to 2021 and constructs an evaluation index system centered on agricultural science and technology innovation. The study evaluates the relationship between agricultural “science and technology innovation-economy-ecology” systems and identifies key obstacle factors using the obstacle degree model. The study draws the following conclusions: Firstly, the comprehensive development level index of the agricultural science and technology innovation system shows an overall linear upward trend (values range from 0.121 to 0.382). Secondly, the comprehensive development level index of the agricultural economic system exhibits an upward trend but with a relatively small overall magnitude (values range from 0.248 to 0.322). Thirdly, the comprehensive development level index of the agricultural ecological system demonstrates significant overall fluctuations, with notable regional disparities (values range from 0.384 to 0.414). Fourthly, the overall agricultural SEE (Science and technological innovation, Economy, Ecology) complex system exhibits a characteristic of “high coupling, low coordination”, identifying the main obstacle factors influencing agricultural SEECS based on a formulated approach. Subsequently, the following policy recommendations are proposed: Firstly, enhance the agricultural technological innovation system and promote green and efficient agricultural technology research and development. Secondly, to accelerate the transformation and upgrading of modern agriculture, achieving green and high-quality development of the agricultural economy. Thirdly, to strengthen agricultural ecological environment protection, laying a solid foundation for the healthy and sustainable development of agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunlin Xiong & Yilin Zhang & Weijie Wang, 2024. "An Evaluation Scheme Driven by Science and Technological Innovation—A Study on the Coupling and Coordination of the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation-Economy-Ecology Complex System in the," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1844-:d:1502167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenqi Ruan & Yongquan Li, 2019. "Coupling Coordination of Internet Development, Technology Innovation and Star Hotel Efficiency," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 15(3), pages 48-64, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei Tong & Yafei Rong, 2022. "Internet, Green Innovation and Industrial Upgrading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Yuqing Geng & Mukasar Maimaituerxun & Han Zhang, 2022. "Coordinated interactions between economy and atmospheric environment: temporal–spatial comparisons from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13887-13916, December.
    3. Lei, Xiao & Shen, Z.Y. & Štreimikienė, Dalia & Baležentis, Tomas & Wang, Guang & Mu, Yunguo, 2024. "Digitalization and sustainable development: Evidence from OECD countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    4. Jing Ye & Lixin Tian & Yuwen Zhou, 2023. "Regional Energy–Economy–Environment Coupling Coordinated Development System Driven by Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutralization over 13 Cities in Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1844-:d:1502167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.