IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i10p1828-d1500627.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Antecedent Configurations of Tea Agricultural Heritage Systems for Sustainable Development from a Symbiotic Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Liyu Mao

    (College of Rural Revitalization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Multifunctional Agricultural Application Research Institute, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jie Ma

    (College of Rural Revitalization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Multifunctional Agricultural Application Research Institute, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wenxin Wu

    (College of Rural Revitalization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Multifunctional Agricultural Application Research Institute, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Wenqiang Jiang

    (College of Economics & Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
    Guangdong Research Center for Rural Policy, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Shuisheng Fan

    (College of Rural Revitalization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    Multifunctional Agricultural Application Research Institute, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    College of JunCao Science and Ecology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

Based on the theories of symbiosis and configurational analysis, this study constructs a theoretical framework for exploring the sustainable development of tea agricultural heritage systems, with an empirical investigation of 40 typical cases in China. Utilizing fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and integrating multi-source data, this study delves into the intricate mechanisms underlying its sustainable development. The findings indicate that the sustainable development of tea agricultural heritage systems is not determined by a single factor but results from the interplay of multiple conditions. Specifically, ecological protection performance and regional driving capacity serve as necessary conditions, while research resource allocation, industrial comprehensive strength, and heritage site development level act as sufficient conditions. Furthermore, the sustainable development pathways can be categorized into two types, namely “dual-cycle drive” and “total-factor drive”, encompassing four configurations. The “dual-cycle drive” emphasizes the mutually beneficial symbiosis between ecological and socio-economic sustainability, involving ecological protection, research resources, regional driving capacity, and industrial strength. The “total-factor drive”, on the other hand, reflects the synergistic symbiosis of ecology, socio-economy, and culture, incorporating various combinations of factors such as ecological protection, regional driving capacity, tea culture inheritance, and heritage site development. Lastly, the driving combinations leading to non-sustainable development exhibit asymmetry, suggesting that the formation of non-sustainability is not merely the reverse outcome of sustainable conditions. The absence of key conditions, such as ecological protection or regional driving capacity, results in the emergence of non-sustainable configurations. In conclusion, this study unveils the complexity and multidimensionality of the sustainable development of tea agricultural heritage systems, providing a scientific basis and practical pathways for formulating effective protection and sustainable development strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyu Mao & Jie Ma & Wenxin Wu & Wenqiang Jiang & Shuisheng Fan, 2024. "Research on the Antecedent Configurations of Tea Agricultural Heritage Systems for Sustainable Development from a Symbiotic Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1828-:d:1500627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1828/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1828/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego F. Uribe & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Ángel Uruburu, 2018. "What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andri Ottesen & Dieter Thom & Rupali Bhagat & Rola Mourdaa, 2023. "Learning from the Future of Kuwait: Scenarios as a Learning Tool to Build Consensus for Actions Needed to Realize Vision 2035," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Stefano Armenia & Rosa Maria Dangelico & Fabio Nonino & Alessandro Pompei, 2019. "Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Filippi, Maryline & Chapdaniel, Alain, 2018. "Adding Value to Sustainable Agri-Food Chains: Experimentation in the Pork Sector," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276199, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Kristijan Robert Prebanić & Mladen Vukomanović, 2021. "Realizing the Need for Digital Transformation of Stakeholder Management: A Systematic Review in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Chee Hua Chin & May Chiun Lo & Zaidi bin Razak & Pooria Pasbakhsh & Abang Azlan Mohamad, 2020. "Resources Confirmation for Tourism Destinations Marketing Efforts Using PLS-MGA: The Moderating Impact of Semirural and Rural Tourism Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez & Xabier Martínez-Beneitez, 2020. "Identifying Risks for Better Project Management between Two Different Cultures: The Chinese and the Spanish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Dorota Kuchta & Jagoda Mrzygłocka-Chojnacka, 2020. "An Approach to Increase the Sustainability of Projects and their Outcomes in Public Sector through Improving Project Definition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Komalsingh Rambaree & Agneta Sundström & Zhao Wang & Sandra Ann Ingela Wright, 2021. "Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for a Swedish Regional Biogas Development: A Thematic Network Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Valeria Breuker & Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Björn Kjellgren & Frédéric Dorel & Marco Toffolon & Diego Uribe & Virna Eccli, 2020. "A Framework of Global Competence for Engineers: The Need for a Sustainable World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    10. Gisele Blak Bernat & Eduardo Linhares Qualharini & Marcela Souto Castro & André Baptista Barcaui & Raquel Reis Soares, 2023. "Sustainability in Project Management and Project Success with Virtual Teams: A Quantitative Analysis Considering Stakeholder Engagement and Knowledge Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-38, June.
    11. Ivy Hawah Taana, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework on The Successful Adoption of Project Management Methodologies in Ghana," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 409-422, August.
    12. Xiaoru Zheng & Chunling Sun & Jingjing Liu, 2024. "Exploring stakeholder engagement in urban village renovation projects through a mixed-method approach to social network analysis: a case study of Tianjin," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Rafael Miñano Rubio & Diego Uribe & Ana Moreno-Romero & Susana Yáñez, 2019. "Embedding Sustainability Competences into Engineering Education. The Case of Informatics Engineering and Industrial Engineering Degree Programs at Spanish Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-29, October.
    14. Ali Foroutan Mirhosseini & Kelly Pitera & James Odeck & Morten Welde, 2022. "Sustainable Project Management: Reducing the Risk of Cost Inaccuracy Using a PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Gisele Blak Bernat & Eduardo Linhares Qualharini & Marcela Souto Castro, 2023. "Enhancing Sustainability in Project Management: The Role of Stakeholder Engagement and Knowledge Management in Virtual Team Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1828-:d:1500627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.