IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i10p1737-d1491148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Dry Matter Yield in Mediterranean Pastures: Comparative Study between Rising Plate Meter and Grassmaster II Probe

Author

Listed:
  • João Serrano

    (MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development and CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, University of Évora, Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal)

  • Júlio Franco

    (MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development and CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, University of Évora, Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal)

  • Shakib Shahidian

    (MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development and CHANGE—Global Change and Sustainability Institute, University of Évora, Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal)

  • Francisco J. Moral

    (Departamento de Expresión Gráfica, Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, Universidad de Extremadura, Avenida de Elvas s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain)

Abstract

This study evaluates two expedient electronic sensors, a rising plate meter (RPM) and a “Grassmaster II” capacitance probe (GMII), to estimate pasture dry matter (DM, in kg ha −1 ). The sampling process consisted of sensor measurements, followed by pasture collection and a laboratory reference analysis. In this comparative study, carried out throughout the 2023/2024 pasture growing season, a total of 288 pasture samples were collected in two phases (calibration and validation). The calibration phase (n = 144) consisted of measurements on three dates (6 December 2023, 29 February and 10 May 2024) in 48 georeferenced sampling areas of the experimental field “Eco-SPAA” (“M G ” field), located at Mitra farm (Évora, Portugal). This pasture is a permanent mixture of various botanical species (grasses, legumes, and others) grazed by sheep, and is representative of biodiverse dryland pastures. The validation phase (n = 144) was carried out between December 2023 and April 2024 in 18 field tests (each with eight pasture samples), in three types of representative pastures: the same mixture for grazing (“M G ” field), a commercial and annual mixture for cutting (mowing) and conservation (“M M ” field), and legumes for grazing (“L G ” field). The best estimation model for DM was obtained based on measurements carried out in February in the case of the GMII probe (R 2 = 0.61) and December 2023 and February 2024 in the case of RPM (R 2 = 0.76). The estimation decreased very significantly for both sensors based on measurements carried out in May (spring). The validation phase showed greater accuracy (less RMSE) in “M G ” field tests (RMSE of 735.4 kg ha −1 with GMII and 512.3 kg ha −1 with the RPM). The results open perspectives for other works that would allow the testing, calibration, and validation of these electronic sensors in a wider range of pasture production conditions, in order to improve their accuracy as decision-making support tools in pasture management.

Suggested Citation

  • João Serrano & Júlio Franco & Shakib Shahidian & Francisco J. Moral, 2024. "Estimation of Dry Matter Yield in Mediterranean Pastures: Comparative Study between Rising Plate Meter and Grassmaster II Probe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1737-:d:1491148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/10/1737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1737-:d:1491148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.