Author
Listed:
- Qiao Jin
(College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
The State Key Laboratory of Soil, Plant and Machine System Technology, Beijing 100083, China)
- Yong You
(College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Haiyi Wang
(College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
The State Key Laboratory of Soil, Plant and Machine System Technology, Beijing 100083, China)
- Xueting Ma
(College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Liang Wang
(College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Decheng Wang
(College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Xianfa Fang
(The State Key Laboratory of Soil, Plant and Machine System Technology, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
Conditioning is an important step in harvesting alfalfa hay, as squeezing and bending alfalfa stems can break down the stem fibers and accelerate the drying rate of alfalfa. The quality of alfalfa hay is directly affected by the conditioning effect. The finite element method (FEM) can quantitatively analyze the interaction relationship between alfalfa and conditioning rollers, which is of great significance for improving conditioning effects and optimizing conditioning systems. The accuracy of material engineering parameters directly affects the simulation results. Due to the small diameter and thin stem wall of alfalfa, some of its material parameters are difficult to measure or have low measurement accuracy. Based on this background, this study proposed a method for calibrating the finite element parameters of thin-walled plant stems. By conducting radial tensile, shear, bending, and radial compression tests on alfalfa stems and combining with the constitutive relationship of the material, the range of engineering parameters for the stems was preliminarily obtained. By conducting a Plackett–Burman experiment, the parameters that affect the maximum shearing force of stems were determined, including Poisson’s ratio in the isotropic plane, radial elastic modulus, and the sliding friction coefficient between the alfalfa stem and steel plate. By conducting the steepest ascent experiment and Box–Behnken experiment, the optimal values of Poisson’s ratio, radial elastic modulus, and sliding friction coefficient were obtained to be 0.42, 28.66 MPa, and 0.60, respectively. Finally, the double-shear experiment, radial compression experiment, and conditioning experiment were used to evaluate the accuracy of the parameters. The results showed that the average relative error between the maximum shear and the measured value was 0.88%, and the average relative error between the maximum radial contact force and the measured value was 2.13%. In the conditioning experiment, the load curve showed the same trend as the measured curve, and the simulation results could demonstrate the stress process and failure mode of alfalfa stems. The modeling and calibration method can effectively predict the stress and failure of alfalfa during conditioning.
Suggested Citation
Qiao Jin & Yong You & Haiyi Wang & Xueting Ma & Liang Wang & Decheng Wang & Xianfa Fang, 2024.
"Calibration and Experimental Verification of Finite Element Parameters for Alfalfa Conditioning Model,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1724-:d:1490262
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:10:p:1724-:d:1490262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.