IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1720-d1228990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pruning Boosts Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Old Valencia Orange Trees: A Field Study

Author

Listed:
  • Adel M. Al-Saif

    (Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hosny F. Abdel-Aziz

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)

  • Sobhy M. Khalifa

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)

  • Ibrahim A. Elnaggar

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)

  • Abd El-wahed N. Abd El-wahed

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)

  • Mohammed H. Farouk

    (Key Laboratory of Product Quality and Security, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Ashraf E. Hamdy

    (Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11651, Egypt)

Abstract

Pruning is an essential practice that helps control branch growth, optimize fruit size, and enhance fruit tree productivity. This study focused on ‘Valencia’ orange trees, which had experienced a decline in productivity after being cultivated on reclaimed lands for several years. The aim was to explore the impact of pruning intensity on vegetation growth, fruit yield, productivity, and fruit quality in these orange trees. The study involved 35-year-old ‘Valencia’ orange trees, which were subjected to four different levels of pruning. The pruning treatments included: T1—no pruning (control group), T2—light pruning (removal of 25% of main branches), T3—moderate pruning (removal of 50% of main branches), and T4—heavy pruning (removal of 75% of main branches). Each season, these pruning measures were consistently carried out on 15 February. The results indicated that the severity of pruning directly influenced vegetative growth parameters, such as shoot length and leaf area. As the pruning intensity increased, so did the growth of the vegetation. However, the overall volume of the tree’s canopy decreased compared to the control group. These findings provide insights into the relationship between pruning practices and the growth and productivity of ‘Valencia’ orange trees. The highest fruit yields were observed when pruning was carried out at a severity level of 75%, followed by 50 and 25%. These pruning treatments had a positive impact on various aspects of fruit quality, including weight, size, firmness, juice content, TSS (°Brix), TSS/acid ratio, and vitamin C content. Additionally, pruning contributed to a greater fruit yield per tree and an overall increase in the yield percentage. In essence, the findings suggest that pruning performed at different severity levels in February effectively promotes vegetation growth and enhances the physical and chemical properties of ‘Valencia’ orange trees. Notably, it resulted in a nearly 20% rise in fruit yield compared to the control group.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel M. Al-Saif & Hosny F. Abdel-Aziz & Sobhy M. Khalifa & Ibrahim A. Elnaggar & Abd El-wahed N. Abd El-wahed & Mohammed H. Farouk & Ashraf E. Hamdy, 2023. "Pruning Boosts Growth, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Old Valencia Orange Trees: A Field Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1720-:d:1228990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1720/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1720/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Chueca & Guillermo Mateu & Cruz Garcerá & Alberto Fonte & Coral Ortiz & Antonio Torregrosa, 2021. "Yield and Economic Results of Different Mechanical Pruning Strategies on “Navel Foyos” Oranges in the Mediterranean Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1720-:d:1228990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.