Author
Listed:
- Shunshun Ding
(College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Juanli Jing
(College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Shiqing Dou
(College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Menglin Zhai
(College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
- Wenjie Zhang
(College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)
Abstract
Rapid and nondestructive prediction of chlorophyll content and response to the growth of various crops using remote sensing technology is a prominent topic in agricultural remote sensing research. Bordeaux mixture has been extensively employed for managing citrus diseases, such as black star and ulcer disease. However, the presence of pesticide residues in Bordeaux mixture can significantly modify the spectral response of the citrus canopy, thereby exerting a substantial influence on the accurate prediction of agronomic indices in fruit trees. In this study, we used unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) multispectral imaging technology to obtain remote sensing imagery of Bordeaux-covered citrus canopies during the months of July, September, and November. We integrated spectral and texture information to construct a high-dimensional feature dataset and performed data downscaling and feature optimization. Furthermore, we established four machine learning models, namely, partial least squares regression (PLS), ridge regression (RR), ridge, random forest (RF), and support vector regression (SVR). Our objectives were to identify the most effective prediction model for estimating the SPAD (soil plant analysis development) value of Bordeaux-covered citrus canopies, assess the variation in prediction accuracy between fused features and individual features, and investigate the impact of Bordeaux solution on the spectral reflectance of the citrus canopy. The results showed that (1) the impact of Bordeaux mixture on citrus canopy reflectance bands ranked from the highest to the lowest as follows: near-infrared band at 840 nm, red-edge band at 730 nm, blue band at 450 nm, green band at 560 nm, and red band at 650 nm. (2) Fused feature models had better prediction ability than single-feature modeling, with an average R 2 value of 0.641 for the four model test sets, improving by 0.117 and 0.039, respectively, compared with single-TF (texture feature) and -VI (vegetation index) modeling, and the test-set root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 2.594 on average, which was 0.533 and 0.264 lower than single-TF and -VI modeling, respectively. (3) Multiperiod data fusion effectively enhanced the correlation between features and SPAD values and consequently improved model prediction accuracy. Compared with accuracy based on individual months, R improved by 0.013 and 0.011, while RMSE decreased by 0.112 and 0.305. (4) The SVR model demonstrated the best performance in predicting citrus canopy SPAD under Bordeaux solution coverage, with R 2 values of 0.629 and 0.658, and RMSE values of 2.722 and 2.752 for the training and test sets, respectively.
Suggested Citation
Shunshun Ding & Juanli Jing & Shiqing Dou & Menglin Zhai & Wenjie Zhang, 2023.
"Citrus Canopy SPAD Prediction under Bordeaux Solution Coverage Based on Texture- and Spectral-Information Fusion,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1701-:d:1227521
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Wenjing Zhu & Zhankang Feng & Shiyuan Dai & Pingping Zhang & Xinhua Wei, 2022.
"Using UAV Multispectral Remote Sensing with Appropriate Spatial Resolution and Machine Learning to Monitor Wheat Scab,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, October.
- Bin Ma & Guangqiao Cao & Chaozhong Hu & Cong Chen, 2023.
"Monitoring the Rice Panicle Blast Control Period Based on UAV Multispectral Remote Sensing and Machine Learning,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1701-:d:1227521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.