Author
Listed:
- Ken Carey
(Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)
- Jacqueline E. Powers
(Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)
- Alexandra Ficht
(Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)
- Tim Dance
(Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)
- Bahram Gharabaghi
(School of Engineering, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)
- Eric M. Lyons
(Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)
Abstract
Evaluating the effectiveness of fertilizers on crops without traditional yield is difficult, as clipping collection is time-consuming and not indicative of the desired response to the fertilizer. Remote sensing techniques, like the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), have emerged as an effective tool to combat these issues. Canopy reflectance, measured by NDVI, is commonly used to differentiate turfgrass response to nitrogen (N) fertilization treatments; however, advancements in data processing are needed for greater differentiation between treatments and better testing of the effects of fertilizer responses. Presented here is an advancement in the processing of NDVI data by applying a compound exponential (pulse peak) function to changes in NDVI over time, relative to a control. This method’s effectiveness in differentiating between fertilizers was evaluated by applying polymer-coated urea (PCU), an enhanced efficiency fertilizer (EEF), and urea on turfgrass to show the usefulness of the novel curve fitting in highlighting differences in fertilizer response. The field study was carried out on an established Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.) blend on a sandy loam soil rootzone maintained with a typical home lawn maintenance regime. Ratios of PCU to urea ranging from 100% urea to 100% PCU with increments of 20% of PCU were used to observe a continuum of response between the two fertilizer types. The N rate for all blends was 73 kg ha −1 , with unfertilized plots used as a control to set baseline measurements for the curve fitting. Turfgrass response to N fertilization treatments was assessed through visual turfgrass quality ratings, dry matter yield, and canopy reflectance, where higher urea content resulted in the shortest time to maximum ∆NDVI (24 days), while 100% EEF reached maximum ∆NDVI at 56 days. The novel curve fitting analysis of the NDVI data allowed for differentiation between treatments, provided a measure of fertilizer effects, and differentiated between urea and enhanced efficiency fertilizers.
Suggested Citation
Ken Carey & Jacqueline E. Powers & Alexandra Ficht & Tim Dance & Bahram Gharabaghi & Eric M. Lyons, 2023.
"Novel Curve Fitting Analysis of NDVI Data to Describe Turf Fertilizer Response,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1532-:d:1208021
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1532-:d:1208021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.