Author
Listed:
- Eleni Tsaliki
(Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Institute, Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Theodoros Moysiadis
(Department of Computer Science, School of Sciences and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Nicosia 2417, Cyprus)
- Evripidis Toumpas
(Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Institute, 66133 Drama, Greece)
- Apostolos Kalivas
(Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Institute, Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Ioannis Panoras
(Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Institute, Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
- Ioannis Grigoriadis
(Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Institute, Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)
Abstract
Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) is an important industrial crop grown in more than one hundred countries worldwide, with high adaptability on a great variety of soils, and under quite diverse climatic conditions. Information regarding the chemical composition of tobacco leaves is important for the tobacco industry because it generally may exhibit important differences among different locations. In this study, five oriental and six flue and air-cured type tobacco varieties were cultivated in five areas of Greece for three cultivation periods, in order to evaluate the effect of these three factors (variety, area, and period), on the yield as well as nicotine content, and sugar and nitrate content of the produced leaves. For the oriental type varieties, the results showed that the area exhibited significant interaction with both variety and the cultivation year, related to the yield. Concerning the nicotine content, no significant differences were observed regarding the areas of experimentation; however, it significantly varied within the varieties. In particular, the nicotine content of Katerini 53 exhibited a significant difference compared to Xanthi 2A, which had the highest content of all tested varieties. Sugar content was affected significantly by all the factors considered, with the area of Xanthi exhibiting lower values compared to all other varieties. Regarding the flue and air-cured varieties, the only interaction that was found to be statistically significant, when the yield was assessed, was between the cultivation year and the area. It was found that there was a significant interaction between cultivation year and area for the nicotine content as well. Furthermore, cultivation year and variety significantly affected the sugar content. The varieties Burley 21E and NC7LC gave the lowest sugars. In general, it was observed that in the case of the oriental type varieties, the variety adaptation in specific regions resulted in higher yields, with the paradigmatic example of the variety Katerini 53 in the Katerini area, and Xanthi 81 in the Xanthi area. On the other hand, in the case of the flue and air-cured varieties, Karditsa was the area that exhibited the lowest yield of all tested varieties.
Suggested Citation
Eleni Tsaliki & Theodoros Moysiadis & Evripidis Toumpas & Apostolos Kalivas & Ioannis Panoras & Ioannis Grigoriadis, 2023.
"Evaluation of Greek Tobacco Varieties ( Nicotiana tabacum L.) Grown in Different Regions οf Greece,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1394-:d:1193212
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1394-:d:1193212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.