IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i7p1276-d1175749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Crushing Effect of Differently Shaped Crushing Rollers on Whole-Plant Silage Maize

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Mu

    (College of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China
    College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Huabiao Li

    (College of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China)

  • Zongyuan Wang

    (College of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China)

  • Qihuan Wang

    (College of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China)

  • Duanyang Geng

    (College of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China)

  • Junke Zhu

    (College of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China)

Abstract

Based on the mechanical test (shear test, compression test), the bond model of corn kernel and straw was established to explore the rolling and crushing effect of different crushing rollers. The type of crushing roller is different. The material crushing process by the force (extrusion and kneading) is different. The mechanical analysis of the crushing process reveals that the disc crushing roller (DCR) has the characteristics of large unit-length kneading area; the spiral-notched serrated crushing roller (SNSCR) has transverse shearing effect on the material; and they affect the crushing effect of the material. By means of discrete element method and simulation test, multiple regression method and variance analysis method are used to systematically analyze the data. The optimal working parameters of each roll (crushing roll speed, crushing clearance, differential ratio) were obtained. The simulation test and bench test of the crushing process of materials with different roll shapes were carried out under the optimal working parameters. The crushing effect was evaluated with a Binzhou screen and a corn silage grain-crushing score screen. The crushed materials of corn kernel can be divided into three categories according to the size (broken grains passed through 2 mm sieve; broken grains passed through 4.75 mm sieve; and broken grains that cannot pass through 4.75 mm sieve), and the crushed materials of corn stalk can be divided into four categories according to the size and thickness (broken straw through 4 mm sieve; broken straw through 8 mm sieve; broken straw through 19 mm sieve; and broken straw that cannot pass 19 mm sieve). The crushing effect and crushing classification of the simulation test and bench test were basically consistent. The results showed that the disc crushing roller group had the highest comprehensive score with straw rolling rate of 89.1% and grain crushing rate of 87.7%, which was the most suitable for harvesting whole-plant silage maize (WSM).

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Mu & Huabiao Li & Zongyuan Wang & Qihuan Wang & Duanyang Geng & Junke Zhu, 2023. "Comparison of Crushing Effect of Differently Shaped Crushing Rollers on Whole-Plant Silage Maize," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1276-:d:1175749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/7/1276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:7:p:1276-:d:1175749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.