IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i6p1168-d1160329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Coffea arabica Cultivars for Resistance to Meloidogyne konaensis

Author

Listed:
  • Roxana Myers

    (Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Hilo, HI 96720, USA)

  • Cathy Mello

    (Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Hilo, HI 96720, USA)

  • Chifumi Nagai

    (Hawaii Agriculture Research Center, Waipahu, HI 96797, USA)

  • Brent Sipes

    (Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA)

  • Tracie Matsumoto

    (Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Hilo, HI 96720, USA)

Abstract

Coffee is an important agricultural crop for the State of Hawaii. Developing new coffee cultivars with resistance to damaging pests and diseases is crucial for improving production and maintaining the profitability of the industry. With the recent discovery of Hemileia vastatrix , coffee leaf rust (CLR), to Hawaii there is a strong interest in replanting with CLR-resistant germplasm. However, when selecting an appropriate cultivar for replanting, susceptibility to other pathogens, such as plant-parasitic nematodes, should be taken into consideration. Meloidogyne konaensis , the Kona coffee root-knot nematode, causes severe destruction of the root system, reducing the yield and causing the mortality of susceptible Coffea arabica cv. Typica trees. Fortunately, resistance to root-knot nematodes has been found in some C. arabica germplasm. In this study, accessions of wild Ethiopian C. arabica and two CLR-resistant C. arabica cultivars, Tupi-HI and Obata, were evaluated for resistance to M. konaensis in a greenhouse bioassay. All Ethiopian accessions retained high levels of resistance, resulting in reproductive factors (Rfs) lower than 1.0, and low root-rot ratings. Tupi-HI was highly susceptible to M. konanensis , with an Rf value of 7.12, whereas Obata was slightly susceptible, with an Rf value of 2.33. Both cultivars had high root-rot ratings, suggesting intolerance to the nematode. Hybridizing Ethiopian C. arabica with Tupi-HI or Obata may result in new elite cultivars, resistant to both H. vastatrix and M. konaensis .

Suggested Citation

  • Roxana Myers & Cathy Mello & Chifumi Nagai & Brent Sipes & Tracie Matsumoto, 2023. "Evaluation of Coffea arabica Cultivars for Resistance to Meloidogyne konaensis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-6, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1168-:d:1160329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1168-:d:1160329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.