Author
Listed:
- Mihaela Dumitru
(Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania)
- Nicoleta Aurelia Lefter
(Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania)
- Mihaela Habeanu
(Research Station for Sericulture, 013685 Bucharest, Romania)
- Georgeta Ciurescu
(Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania)
- Dan C. Vodnar
(Department of Food Science, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Manastur, No. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
- Simon Elemer
(Department of Food Science, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Manastur, No. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)
- Ionut Sorescu
(Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Biotechnology, National Research Development Institute for Biology and Animal Nutrition, 077015 Balotesti, Romania
Institute for Diagnosis and Animal Health, 050557 Bucharest, Romania)
- Sergiu Emil Georgescu
(Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei, No. 91-95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania)
- Andreea Dudu
(Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei, No. 91-95, 050095 Bucharest, Romania)
Abstract
Fourteen lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains were isolated from the intestinal tract and feces of piglets. Among these isolates, only twelve were biochemically (API 50 CHL and ABIS online for bacterial identification) and genetically (16S rRNA sequencing) confirmed as Limosilactobacillus fermentum , Lactobacillus acidophilus , and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum . Experiments to evaluate the probiotic potential of the isolates including pH tolerance (pH 2.0 and 3.0), bile salts (0.3% ox gall) resistance, hemolysis activity, antibiotic susceptibility, and high-temperature resistance were tested. Only two isolates from identified strains exhibited high survival rates when exposed to low pH and bile salts, these were L. acidophilus IBNA 76 and L. plantarum IBNA 84. The antibiotic test presented 100% resistance of both strains to gentamicin, kanamycin, lincomycin, colistin sulfate, erythromycin, amikacin, oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin, streptomycin, and tilmicosin, lower than the 0.6 mm inhibition zone diameter. Promising isolates ( L. acidophilus IBNA 76 and L. plantarum IBNA 84) were exposed to the spray-drying technique based on visible probiotic potential and survival rates. Carrier matrix material was used as a maltodextrin-glucose solution. The encapsulation probiotic isolated survived both over 67% and 77%, corresponding to a decrease in strain viability from 10 9 to 10 7 CFU/g. After further in vitro evaluations, the findings of this study showed that, from all LAB strains, L. acidophilus IBNA 76 and L. plantarum IBNA 84 may be considered probiotic candidates for animal nutrition and may have promising performance in piglet feed due to their origin of isolation.
Suggested Citation
Mihaela Dumitru & Nicoleta Aurelia Lefter & Mihaela Habeanu & Georgeta Ciurescu & Dan C. Vodnar & Simon Elemer & Ionut Sorescu & Sergiu Emil Georgescu & Andreea Dudu, 2023.
"Evaluation of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Piglets Tract and Encapsulation of Selected Probiotic Cells,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1098-:d:1152037
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1098-:d:1152037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.