Author
Listed:
- Ana Luisa Alves Ribeiro
(Postgraduate Program in Agronomy, Institute of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38410-337, Brazil)
- Gabriel Mascarenhas Maciel
(Institute of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo 38500-000, Brazil)
- Ana Carolina Silva Siquieroli
(Institute of Biotechnology, Federal University of Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo 38500-000, Brazil)
- José Magno Queiroz Luz
(Institute of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38410-337, Brazil)
- Rodrigo Bezerra de Araujo Gallis
(Institute of Geography, Federal University of Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo 38500-000, Brazil)
- Pablo Henrique de Souza Assis
(Postgraduate Program in Agriculture and Geospatial Information, Institute of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Monte Carmelo 38500-000, Brazil)
- Hugo César Rodrigues Moreira Catão
(Institute of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38410-337, Brazil)
- Rickey Yoshio Yada
(Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)
Abstract
Urbanization has provided greater demand for food, and the search for strategies capable of reducing waste is essential to ensure food security. Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.) culture has a short life cycle and its harvest point is determined visually, causing waste and important losses. Using vegetation indices could be an important alternative to reduce errors during harvest definition. The objective of this study was to evaluate different vegetation indices to predict the growth rate and harvest point of lettuce. Twenty-five genotypes of biofortified green lettuce were evaluated. The Green Leaf Index (GLI), Normalized Green Red Difference Index (NGRDI), Spectral Slope Saturation Index (SI), and Overall Hue Index (HUE) were calculated from images captured at 1, 8, 18, 24, and 36 days after transplanting (vegetative state). The diameter and average leaf area of plants were measured using QGIS software. Green mass, number of leaves, and plant and stem diameter were measured in the field. The means were compared using the Scott–Knott test ( p ≤ 0.05) and simple linear regression models were generated to monitor the growth rate, obtaining R 2 values ranging from 62% to 99%. Genetic dissimilarity was confirmed by the multivariate analysis presenting a cophenetic correlation coefficient of 88.49%. Furthermore, validation between data collected in the field versus data obtained by imaging was performed using Pearson’s correlations and showed moderate to high values. Overall, the vegetation indices SI, GLI, and NGRDI were efficient for monitoring the growth rate and determining the harvest point of different green lettuce genotypes, in attempts to reduce waste and losses. It is suggested that the definition of the harvest point based on vegetation indices are specific for each genotype.
Suggested Citation
Ana Luisa Alves Ribeiro & Gabriel Mascarenhas Maciel & Ana Carolina Silva Siquieroli & José Magno Queiroz Luz & Rodrigo Bezerra de Araujo Gallis & Pablo Henrique de Souza Assis & Hugo César Rodrigues , 2023.
"Vegetation Indices for Predicting the Growth and Harvest Rate of Lettuce,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1091-:d:1151159
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1091-:d:1151159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.