IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i3p699-d1100459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Agricultural Green Development Based on Gini Coefficient and Hesitation Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: The Case of China

Author

Listed:
  • Min Wan

    (College of Shipping Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Haibo Kuang

    (College of Shipping Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Yanbo Yang

    (College of Shipping Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Bi He

    (Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Sue Zhao

    (College of Shipping Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

  • Ying Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China)

  • Jingyi Huo

    (College of Shipping Economics and Management, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China)

Abstract

In order to systematically solve the problem of formulating agricultural green development strategies based on the four dimensions of policy green, industry green, science and technology green, and awareness green, this paper uses the method of combining the Gini coefficient with hesitation fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making to carry out research. The research shows that: (1) The three most critical factors affecting the green development of agriculture are “consumers’ awareness of purchasing green agricultural products”, “investment in the construction of rural ecological civilization” and “the number of farmers’ scientific and technological training”, and the corresponding index weights are 0.12, 0.1 and 0.1, respectively. (2) There are differences in policy, industry, science and technology, and consciousness in the green development of agriculture. The green development of policy shows an obvious upward trend. The industrial green development shows a relatively gentle upward trend. The green development of science and technology showed rapid growth from 2011 to 2017, and the growth slowed down in the following two years and showed a downward trend in 2020. The awareness of green development shows a relatively stable upward trend. (3) The green development of agriculture is jointly driven by the relevant interests of the supply side, the demand side, and the regulator, and the demand side’s requirements for high-quality agricultural products become a stronger driving force for the green development of agriculture. The change in the consciousness and thinking of agricultural product producers on the supply side has become the basis for the green development of agriculture, and the implementation of government policies has become an important guarantee for the green development of agriculture. The innovation of this paper is to build an evaluation index system including government, consumers, farmers’ awareness of multiple subjects, government policies at all levels, industrial production status, and agricultural production technology. At the same time, we build an evaluation model that can comprehensively analyze quantitative and qualitative indicators. In view of the need for a holistic analysis of the agricultural system in the study of agricultural green development, future studies will include air pollution emissions and agricultural transport services in the evaluation model to improve the scientific and universal model.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Wan & Haibo Kuang & Yanbo Yang & Bi He & Sue Zhao & Ying Wang & Jingyi Huo, 2023. "Evaluation of Agricultural Green Development Based on Gini Coefficient and Hesitation Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: The Case of China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:699-:d:1100459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Zhou & Chunhui Wen, 2023. "Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-47, July.
    2. Hong Li & Weiwei Zhang & Xiao Xiao & Fei Lun & Yifu Sun & Na Sun, 2023. "Temporal and Spatial Changes of Agriculture Green Development in Beijing’s Ecological Conservation Developing Areas from 2006 to 2016," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Chengmin Li & Haoyu Deng & Guoxin Yu & Rong Kong & Jian Liu, 2024. "Impact Effects of Cooperative Participation on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technologies by Cotton Farmers and the Driving Mechanisms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Changhong Chen & Huijie Zhang, 2023. "Evaluation of Green Development Level of Mianyang Agriculture, Based on the Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:699-:d:1100459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.