IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i3p572-d1081378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Comparative Field Studies for Root and Onion Harvester with Variable Angle Conveyor

Author

Listed:
  • Alexey Dorokhov

    (FSBSI “Federal Scientific Agronomic and Engineering Center VIM”, Moscow 109428, Russia)

  • Alexander Aksenov

    (FSBSI “Federal Scientific Agronomic and Engineering Center VIM”, Moscow 109428, Russia)

  • Alexey Sibirev

    (FSBSI “Federal Scientific Agronomic and Engineering Center VIM”, Moscow 109428, Russia)

  • Maxim Mosyakov

    (FSBSI “Federal Scientific Agronomic and Engineering Center VIM”, Moscow 109428, Russia)

  • Nikolay Sazonov

    (FSBSI “Federal Scientific Agronomic and Engineering Center VIM”, Moscow 109428, Russia)

  • Maria Godyaeva

    (FSBSI “Federal Scientific Agronomic and Engineering Center VIM”, Moscow 109428, Russia)

Abstract

The long-term storage of vegetable crops and potatoes in storage, even with a small content of soil and plant impurities in the heap, does not ensure the preservation of the required quality indicators of marketable products. The lack of modern technological foundations for improving the design parameters of machines for harvesting vegetables and potatoes leads to the impossibility of eliminating the loss of root crops, their damage, as well as the high-quality process of cleaning from impurities. This circumstance is due to the fact that modern technologies and technical means of harvesting root crops and onions are not able to provide high-quality marketable products with minimal labor costs. In this regard, a modern separating system of the harvesting machine has been developed, which ensures the variation of technological parameters under changing conditions for the harvesting of root crops and onions. The experimental studies of the developed harvester with an experimental separating system made it possible to ensure the high-quality harvesting of potato and onion tubers with the following parameter values: a completeness of separation of more than 98% and a damage to products up to 1.7%, at a speed of movement of 1.7 m/s for the separating system; a completeness of separation of more than 98% and a product damage of up to 1.1% at a speed of up to 1.0 m/s for the harvester; and a separation completeness of more than 98% and a product damage of up to 1.4% at a commercial product extraction depth of 0.02 m. The results of comparative studies on the quality indicators of the machine for harvesting root crops in the harvesting of potato and onion tubers are presented, indicating the prevailing values of the quality indicators of work in the harvesting of potatoes, depending on the change in the regime indicators of the quality of work.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexey Dorokhov & Alexander Aksenov & Alexey Sibirev & Maxim Mosyakov & Nikolay Sazonov & Maria Godyaeva, 2023. "Evaluation of Comparative Field Studies for Root and Onion Harvester with Variable Angle Conveyor," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:572-:d:1081378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexey Dorokhov & Otari Didmanidze & Alexander Aksenov & Alexey Sibirev & Maxim Mosyakov & Nikolay Sazonov & Maria Godyaeva, 2023. "The Results of Experimental Studies of the Physical and Mechanical Properties of an Elastic-Plastic Material for Tribological Properties during Separation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Vadim Bolshev & Vladimir Panchenko & Alexey Sibirev, 2023. "Engineering Innovations in Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-4, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:572-:d:1081378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.