IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i3p513-d1075202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Responses to Adventitious Rhizogenesis under Indole-3-Butyric Acid and Seaweed Extracts in Ornamental’s Cuttings: First Results in Photinia x fraseri ‘Red Robin’

Author

Listed:
  • Danilo Loconsole

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari, “Aldo Moro”, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Anna Elisa Sdao

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari, “Aldo Moro”, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Cristiano

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari, “Aldo Moro”, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Barbara De Lucia

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari, “Aldo Moro”, Via Amendola 165/A, 70126 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

Fraser’s photinia ‘Red Robin’ ( Photinia x fraseri Dress, Rosaceae family) is an important primary ornamental landscaping species with optimal hedge or screen effects and low maintenance, but it is difficult to root when propagated by cuttings, although high concentrations of phytohormones are used to optimize rhizogenesis. To our knowledge, there is currently no feasible enhanced method for photinia vegetative propagation through stem cuttings, using seaweed extract-based biostimulants as root promoters. Given the economic importance of the species, this research aims to assess the effects of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and seaweed extract-based stimulators on the quality of photinia ‘Red Robin’ cuttings, in terms of rooting indicators and ground and aboveground agronomic features. The treatments applied were different concentrations of commercial rooting stimulators compared to an untreated control: C0: distilled water; Rhizopon AA: 1% IBA (R1); Kelpak ® : 2 mL L −1 (K2); Kelpak ® : 3 mL L −1 (K3); Goteo ® : 2 mL L −1 (G2); Goteo ® : 3 mL L −1 (G3). The first results showed different responses to adventitious rhizogenesis under IBA and both seaweed extract treatments. At 70 DAC (days after cutting), the seaweed extract stimulated the production of over 80% of cuttings with callus; at 240 DAC, the percentage of rooted cuttings treated under R1 was the highest = 34.3%; the worst results were obtained by both biostimulant treatments at the highest doses: K3 = 21.3% and G3 = 20.7%. Furthermore, R1 produced 3.07 roots per cutting, which was 50% higher than the average of all other treatments. The applications of Kelpak ® and Goteo ® biostimulants, at both concentrations, resulted in an inhibition of root length with values below the untreated control. Rooted cuttings under R1 showed the highest ground (0.35 g) and aboveground (0.47) dry value. Neither seaweed extract, Kelpak ® or Goteo ® , at different concentrations, improved both the ground and above-ground weights of rooted cutting, compared to the untreated control, indicating that these natural products are not suitable for Fraser’s photinia ‘Red Robin’ propagation using this methodology. The overall quality of cuttings in IBA treatment was the strongest, with 1%, being the optimum concentration. Further research must be conducted to propose effective agronomic protocols by investigating application methods, doses and number of applications, and to clarify the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of action of these seaweed extracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Danilo Loconsole & Anna Elisa Sdao & Giuseppe Cristiano & Barbara De Lucia, 2023. "Different Responses to Adventitious Rhizogenesis under Indole-3-Butyric Acid and Seaweed Extracts in Ornamental’s Cuttings: First Results in Photinia x fraseri ‘Red Robin’," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:513-:d:1075202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:513-:d:1075202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.