Author
Listed:
- Michela Mosca
(Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)
- Jernej Bubnic
(Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Luigi Giannetti
(Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)
- Luca Fortugno
(Servizi Veterinari ASL di Viterbo, via D. Alighieri 100, 01027 Montefiascone, Italy)
- Marco Pietropaoli
(Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)
- Veronica Manara
(Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)
- Elisabetta Bonerba
(Department of Veterinary Medicine, Food Safety Unit, University of Bari, Str. Prov. Casamassima Km 3, 70010 Valenzano, Italy)
- Giovanni Formato
(Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Rome, Italy)
Abstract
American foulbrood (AFB) and European foulbrood (EFB) are the two most important bacterial diseases that affect honey bee brood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an integrated treatment of AFB and EFB in naturally infected colonies in spring, using the beekeeping technique partial shook swarm combined with oxytetracycline treatment. The following parameters were assessed: strength of the colonies, consumption of antibiotic solution, queen losses, honey production and relapses. An increase in strength was observed in both (AFB and EFB) groups. Mean syrup consumption in the AFB colonies was 444.2 mL, while in the EFB colonies it was 497.3 mL. Linear correlation between the strength of the colonies and consumption ( p -values < 0.0001; R² = 0.448) was observed. Three queens out of thirty (10%) were lost during the shook swarm procedure: one in the AFB group (5.3%) and two in the EFB group (18.2%). The results highlighted four clinical relapses (22.2%) of AFB, and no relapse (0%) of EFB after two years of observation. Six colonies (four in the AFB group and two in the EFB group) produced honey in the same beekeeping season that the shook swarm and antibiotic treatment were performed. Partial shook swarm is a good alternative to colony destruction, especially for EFB, and provides productive colonies during the foraging season.
Suggested Citation
Michela Mosca & Jernej Bubnic & Luigi Giannetti & Luca Fortugno & Marco Pietropaoli & Veronica Manara & Elisabetta Bonerba & Giovanni Formato, 2023.
"Adoption of Partial Shook Swarm in the Integrated Control of American and European Foulbrood of Honey Bee ( Apis mellifera L.),"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:363-:d:1055528
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:363-:d:1055528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.