IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p351-d1053130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Combination of Serum and Oral Fluid Cortisol Levels and Welfare Quality Protocol ® for Assessment of Pig Welfare on Intensive Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Plut

    (Clinic for Ruminants and Pigs, Clinic for Reproduction and Large Animals, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Tomaž Snoj

    (Institute of Preclinical Sciences, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Irena Golinar Oven

    (Clinic for Ruminants and Pigs, Clinic for Reproduction and Large Animals, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Marina Štukelj

    (Clinic for Ruminants and Pigs, Clinic for Reproduction and Large Animals, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Animal welfare is important; therefore, veterinarians and other animal welfare experts try to use different tools for pig welfare assessment. Several welfare protocols are available for pig welfare assessment, and one of the most used is Welfare Quality (WQ) protocol ® . Elevated values of cortisol can be indicative of stress and, therefore, poor welfare. Our aim was to assess the correlation between serum cortisol levels from individual samples and oral fluid cortisol levels in group samples with the grades received for pig welfare using the WQ protocol ® . Samples were taken at six different commercial pig farms. Animals were divided into age-dependent categories: 5 weeks old (w/o); 7 w/o; 9 w/o; 11 w/o weaners; fatteners; and breeding sows (10 pigs/category). Cortisol was determined in individual sera and group samples of oral fluid (OF), and was compared to values considered to be physiological. Based on WQ protocol ® answers, five farms’ welfare level was deemed acceptable, and one was enhanced. Four out of 29 sera and 5 out of 30 OF samples were considered physiological, while in most other samples it was elevated. The correlation between cortisol levels in sera, OF, and WQ protocol ® scores was not statistically significant. The cortisol level in OF should be just one of the welfare indicators, i.e., alongside the WQ protocol ® filled out by a welfare expert.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Plut & Tomaž Snoj & Irena Golinar Oven & Marina Štukelj, 2023. "The Combination of Serum and Oral Fluid Cortisol Levels and Welfare Quality Protocol ® for Assessment of Pig Welfare on Intensive Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:351-:d:1053130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mth:jbls88:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:78-86 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mona L. V. Larsen & Meiqing Wang & Tomas Norton, 2021. "Information Technologies for Welfare Monitoring in Pigs and Their Relation to Welfare Quality ®," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:351-:d:1053130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.