IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i1p140-d1025985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical and Amylose Content Profiling in Rice Noodles from Diverse Rice Hybrids in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hang Huang

    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yufei Li

    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiale Zeng

    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Yazi Cao

    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Tiancheng Zhang

    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Guanghui Chen

    (The Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Innovation and Resource Utilization of Hunan Province, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Yue Wang

    (Department of Agronomy, College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

Abstract

Rice noodles are one of southern people’s favorite foods in China, so it is important to find the suitable raw rice for rice noodle making. To study the effects of different rice varieties on the quality of fresh wet rice noodles and to explore the relationship between the quality of the rice and the quality of the fresh wet rice noodles, this study to compare the 12 hybrid rice varieties as raw materials analyzed the differences in the cooking quality, texture index, and sensory score of fresh wet rice noodles using the principal component analysis, membership function, and cluster analysis. The results showed that the quality of fresh wet rice noodles prepared from different hybrid rice materials differed significantly. The fresh wet rice noodles made from Liangyou 5836 are of good quality, and they are mainly characterized by a low rate of broken noodles and spit pulp value, high rice noodle hardness, good rice noodle elasticity, strong rice noodle chewiness, and low adhesiveness. Moreover, its sensory evaluation is also better than that of other varieties. The comprehensive evaluation of 12 hybrid rice varieties by subordinate function analysis also showed that Liangyou 5836 was the best. In addition, through principal component analysis and gray analysis, it was found that 14 related indicators of rice quality and fresh wet rice noodle quality were concentrated into four categories, among which gel consistency best reflects the quality of rice and fresh wet rice noodles. Through comprehensive analysis, it was found that an amylose content of about 22% and a gel consistency of less than 40 mm can be used as core indicators to screen varieties suitable for making rice noodles. This study is of great significance for the selection of hybrid rice for both rice quality and fresh wet rice noodle quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hang Huang & Yufei Li & Jiale Zeng & Yazi Cao & Tiancheng Zhang & Guanghui Chen & Yue Wang, 2023. "Comparative Quality Evaluation of Physicochemical and Amylose Content Profiling in Rice Noodles from Diverse Rice Hybrids in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:140-:d:1025985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/140/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/140/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:140-:d:1025985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.