Author
Listed:
- Camilo André Pereira Contreras Sánchez
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Marco Antonio Tecchio
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Daniel Callili
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues da Silva
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Leticia Silva Pereira Basílio
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Sarita Leonel
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Juan Carlos Alonso
(Department of Horticulture, Campus Botucatu, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo 01049-010, Brazil)
- Giuseppina Pace Pereira Lima
(Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute of Biosciences (IBB), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-970, Brazil)
Abstract
Brazil has emerged as a significant producer of seedless grapes due to high consumer demand. This has led to increased production of seedless grapes in non-traditional cultivation regions, such as subtropical areas. To meet this demand, the search for new grape varieties suitable for these conditions, such as the ‘BRS Isis’ variety, has become an option for growers. The interaction between grape cultivars and rootstocks is specific, and their adaptability to climatic conditions can result in uneven performance. Therefore, the choice of rootstock should be considered before making any recommendations. The purpose of this study was to assess the productive performance, physical-chemical, and biochemical properties of the ‘BRS Isis’ vine grafted onto rootstocks (‘IAC 572’, ‘IAC 766’, and ‘Paulsen 1103’) in two production cycles. The experimental design consisted of randomized blocks, with seven blocks and three plants per plot, for a total of 63 vines. Thus, the vine’s income components, physical qualities of bunches and berries, chemical profile, bioactive substances, and antioxidant activity were assessed. The Tukey test (5% probability) was used to compare means between rootstocks. The data on scion cultivar and rootstock pairings were further evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA). There were substantial variations in the rootstocks, with ‘IAC 572’ and ‘IAC 766’ producing more bunches, generating more fresh mass, and having a longer bunch length than ‘Paulsen 1103’. However, phenolic compounds and flavonoids were greater in ‘BRS Isis’ grapes than in ‘Paulsen 1103’. ‘BRS Isis’ shows good adaptation to subtropical environments when employing the IAC 572 and IAC 766 rootstocks due to their higher yield and bioactive component accumulation compared to grapes grafted onto ‘Paulsen 1103’. However, regardless of the rootstock utilized, ‘BRS Isis’ grapes perform well commercially in subtropical environments.
Suggested Citation
Camilo André Pereira Contreras Sánchez & Marco Antonio Tecchio & Daniel Callili & Marlon Jocimar Rodrigues da Silva & Leticia Silva Pereira Basílio & Sarita Leonel & Juan Carlos Alonso & Giuseppina Pa, 2023.
"Productivity and Physicochemical Properties of the BRS Isis Grape on Various Rootstocks under Subtropical Climatic Conditions,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:2113-:d:1275903
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:11:p:2113-:d:1275903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.