IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p1879-d1247790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Prophylactic Application of Systemic Insecticides Contributes to the Management of the Hibiscus Bud Weevil Anthonomus testaceosquamosus Linell (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Author

Listed:
  • German Vargas

    (Entomology and Nematology Department, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th St, Homestead, FL 33031, USA)

  • A. Daniel Greene

    (School of Natural Sciences, High Point University, 1 N University Pkwy, High Point, NC 27268, USA)

  • Yisell Velazquez-Hernandez

    (Entomology and Nematology Department, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th St, Homestead, FL 33031, USA)

  • Xiangbing Yang

    (Subtropical Horticulture Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 13601 Old Cutler Rd, Miami, FL 33158, USA)

  • Paul E. Kendra

    (Subtropical Horticulture Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 13601 Old Cutler Rd, Miami, FL 33158, USA)

  • Alexandra M. Revynthi

    (Entomology and Nematology Department, Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280th St, Homestead, FL 33031, USA)

Abstract

The hibiscus bud weevil is an invasive pest that attacks tropical hibiscus. Its management has been challenging due to its cryptic adult and concealed immature stages. We evaluated the efficiency of four systemic insecticides (spirotetramat, chlorantraniliprole, flupyradifurone, and cyantraniliprole) against the pest using two approaches: one applied 4 weeks before infestation (prophylactic) and the other 1 week after (curative). The number of eggs, larvae, and feeding holes per sampled bud were recorded 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after the infestation (prophylactic), and after the application (curative), respectively. In general, a greater number of treatment effects were detected in the prophylactic approach in comparison with those in the curative. With the prophylactic approach, the mean number of larvae and feeding holes per actively growing bud was significantly greater for the control (water) than for all insecticides. Among fallen buds, chlorantraniliprole, cyantraniliprole, and spirotetramat had significantly fewer feeding holes than those in the control. With the curative approach, the mean number of feeding holes was greater in the control with no differences among insecticides. The prophylactic application can effectively suppress initial HBW infestation, in contrast to the curative application targeting already high populations. This provides the opportunity for reducing the impact of this regulated pest in areas of expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • German Vargas & A. Daniel Greene & Yisell Velazquez-Hernandez & Xiangbing Yang & Paul E. Kendra & Alexandra M. Revynthi, 2023. "A Prophylactic Application of Systemic Insecticides Contributes to the Management of the Hibiscus Bud Weevil Anthonomus testaceosquamosus Linell (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1879-:d:1247790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1879/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1879/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1879-:d:1247790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.