Author
Listed:
- Tianle Xu
(Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
International Joint Research Laboratory in Universities of Jiangsu Province of China for Domestic Animal Germplasm Resources and Genetic Improvement, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)
- Wendi Cao
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)
- Yicai Huang
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)
- Jingwen Zhao
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)
- Xinyue Wu
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)
- Zhangping Yang
(Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China)
Abstract
Bovine mastitis is often taken as one of the most common diseases in dairy farms, which its pathophysiology leads to a reduction of milk production and its quality. The penetration of pathogenic bacteria into the mammary gland, through either a contagious or environmental approach, has been determined the way of infection. The mastitis derived bacteria have become a challenge in practice, since the increasing exposure of antimicrobial. In order to identify characteristics of the epidemiological regulation and drug resistance of the pathogenic bacteria of bovine mastitis in northern Jiangsu, 156 clinical mastitis milk samples were collected from 3 large-scale farms for the epidemiological investigation and analysis of the drug resistance of E. coli . The bacteria were positively isolated in a total of 143 milk samples. The results showed that 78 strains of E. coli were detected, with a prevalence rate of 26.99%, followed by 67 strains of K. pneumoniae , with a prevalence of 23.19%, and 38 strains of Staphylococcus , with a prevalence of spp. 13.15%. In addition, 78 strains of E. coli isolated from bovine mastitis were tested for susceptibility to 8 kinds of antibiotics. It was shown that gentamicin and tetracycline were the most effective against E. coli , with the susceptibility rate of 83.3%, followed by streptomycin and ciprofloxacin, with 73.1% and 71.8% respectively. However, β-lactams including penicillin, cefothiophene, and amoxicillin showed serious resistance to E. coli isolates. There were 12 drug resistance genes detected by PCR, including β-lactam (blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV), aminoglycoside (armA and armB), tetracycline (tetA, tetB, and tetC), and quinolone (qnrS, qepA, oqxA, and oqxB) related genes. Notably, all E. coli isolates carried blaTEM gene (100%). The detection rate of blaCTX-M was 53.8%, followed by the detection of blaSHV (20.5%), armA (9.0%), tetA (26.9%), tetB (2.6%), tetC (20.5%), qnrS (29.5%), oqxA (37.2%) and oqxB (1.3%). The present study provides crucial information on the distribution of bovine mastitis derived bacterial pathogens in Jiangsu province, as well as highlighting the antimicrobial resistance which might help to improve the efficiency of antibiotics treatment on bovine mastitis.
Suggested Citation
Tianle Xu & Wendi Cao & Yicai Huang & Jingwen Zhao & Xinyue Wu & Zhangping Yang, 2022.
"The Prevalence of Escherichia coli Derived from Bovine Clinical Mastitis and Distribution of Resistance to Antimicrobials in Part of Jiangsu Province, China,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:90-:d:1018540
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2022:i:1:p:90-:d:1018540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.