IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1493-d918000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automatic Tandem Dual BlendMask Networks for Severity Assessment of Wheat Fusarium Head Blight

Author

Listed:
  • Yichao Gao

    (College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors are co-first authors.)

  • Hetong Wang

    (College of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors are co-first authors.)

  • Man Li

    (Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Xinhua College of Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750030, China)

  • Wen-Hao Su

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) disease reduces wheat yield and quality. Breeding wheat varieties with resistance genes is an effective way to reduce the impact of this disease. This requires trained experts to assess the disease resistance of hundreds of wheat lines in the field. Manual evaluation methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. The evaluation results are greatly affected by human factors. Traditional machine learning methods are only suitable for small-scale datasets. Intelligent and accurate assessment of FHB severity could significantly facilitate rapid screening of resistant lines. In this study, the automatic tandem dual BlendMask deep learning framework was used to simultaneously segment the wheat spikes and diseased areas to enable the rapid detection of the disease severity. The feature pyramid network (FPN), based on the ResNet-50 network, was used as the backbone of BlendMask for feature extraction. The model exhibited positive performance in the segmentation of wheat spikes with precision, recall, and MIoU (mean intersection over union) values of 85.36%, 75.58%, and 56.21%, respectively, and the segmentation of diseased areas with precision, recall, and MIoU values of 78.16%, 79.46%, and 55.34%, respectively. The final recognition accuracies of the model for wheat spikes and diseased areas were 85.56% and 99.32%, respectively. The disease severity was obtained from the ratio of the diseased area to the spike area. The average accuracy for FHB severity classification reached 91.80%, with the average F 1-score of 92.22%. This study demonstrated the great advantage of a tandem dual BlendMask network in intelligent screening of resistant wheat lines.

Suggested Citation

  • Yichao Gao & Hetong Wang & Man Li & Wen-Hao Su, 2022. "Automatic Tandem Dual BlendMask Networks for Severity Assessment of Wheat Fusarium Head Blight," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1493-:d:918000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yujia Zhang & Luteng Zhong & Yu Ding & Hongfeng Yu & Zhaoyu Zhai, 2023. "ResViT-Rice: A Deep Learning Model Combining Residual Module and Transformer Encoder for Accurate Detection of Rice Diseases," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Ya-Hong Wang & Jun-Jiang Li & Wen-Hao Su, 2023. "An Integrated Multi-Model Fusion System for Automatically Diagnosing the Severity of Wheat Fusarium Head Blight," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1493-:d:918000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.