IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1429-d911010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sentinel-2 Data for Land Use Mapping: Comparing Different Supervised Classifications in Semi-Arid Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Khouloud Abida

    (National Institute of Agronomy of Tunisia (INAT), Carthage University, Avenue Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)

  • Meriem Barbouchi

    (Laboratoire Sciences et Techniques Agronomiques (LR16INRAT05), National Institute of Agricultural Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Carthage University, Tunis 1004, Tunisia)

  • Khaoula Boudabbous

    (National Institute of Agronomy of Tunisia (INAT), Carthage University, Avenue Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)

  • Wael Toukabri

    (Laboratoire Sciences et Techniques Agronomiques (LR16INRAT05), National Institute of Agricultural Research of Tunisia (INRAT), Carthage University, Tunis 1004, Tunisia)

  • Karem Saad

    (Ecole National des Ingénieurs de Sfax (ENIS), Carthage University, Sfax 3038, Tunisia)

  • Habib Bousnina

    (National Institute of Agronomy of Tunisia (INAT), Carthage University, Avenue Charles Nicolle, Tunis 1082, Tunisia)

  • Thouraya Sahli Chahed

    (National Centre for Mapping and Remote Sensing, Ministry of National Defense (CNCT), Tunis 1080, Tunisia)

Abstract

Mapping and monitoring land use (LU) changes is one of the most effective ways to understand and manage land transformation. The main objectives of this study were to classify LU using supervised classification methods and to assess the effectiveness of various machine learning methods. The current investigation was conducted in the Nord-Est area of Tunisia, and an optical satellite image covering the study area was acquired from Sentinel-2. For LU mapping, we tested three machine learning models algorithms: Random Forest (RF), K-Dimensional Trees K-Nearest Neighbors (KDTree-KNN) and Minimum Distance Classification (MDC). According to our research, the RF classification provided a better result than other classification models. RF classification exhibited the best values of overall accuracy, kappa, recall, precision and RMSE, with 99.54%, 0.98%, 0.98%, 0.98% and 0.23%, respectively. However, low precision was observed for the MDC method (RMSE = 1.15). The results were more intriguing since they highlighted the value of the bare soil index as a covariate for LU mapping. Our results suggest that Sentinel-2 combined with RF classification is efficient for creating a LU map.

Suggested Citation

  • Khouloud Abida & Meriem Barbouchi & Khaoula Boudabbous & Wael Toukabri & Karem Saad & Habib Bousnina & Thouraya Sahli Chahed, 2022. "Sentinel-2 Data for Land Use Mapping: Comparing Different Supervised Classifications in Semi-Arid Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1429-:d:911010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1429/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1429/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Can Trong Nguyen & Amnat Chidthaisong & Phan Kieu Diem & Lian-Zhi Huo, 2021. "A Modified Bare Soil Index to Identify Bare Land Features during Agricultural Fallow-Period in Southeast Asia Using Landsat 8," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Nij Tontisirin & Sutee Anantsuksomsri, 2021. "Economic Development Policies and Land Use Changes in Thailand: From the Eastern Seaboard to the Eastern Economic Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Ge Shi & Nan Jiang & Lianqiu Yao, 2018. "Land Use and Cover Change during the Rapid Economic Growth Period from 1990 to 2010: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.
    4. G. Banko, 1998. "A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data and of Methods Including Remote Sensing Data in Forest Inventory," Working Papers ir98081, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenfei Luan & Ge Li & Bo Zhong & Jianwei Geng & Xin Li & Hui Li & Shi He, 2023. "Improving Dryland Urban Land Cover Classification Accuracy Using a Classical Convolution Neural Network," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Manel Khlif & Maria José Escorihuela & Aicha Chahbi Bellakanji & Giovanni Paolini & Zeineb Kassouk & Zohra Lili Chabaane, 2023. "Multi-Year Cereal Crop Classification Model in a Semi-Arid Region Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat 7–8 Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Sa’ad Ibrahim, 2022. "Improving Land Use/Cover Classification Accuracy from Random Forest Feature Importance Selection Based on Synergistic Use of Sentinel Data and Digital Elevation Model in Agriculturally Dominated Lands," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selamawit Haftu Gebresellase & Zhiyong Wu & Huating Xu & Wada Idris Muhammad, 2023. "Scenario-Based LULC Dynamics Projection Using the CA–Markov Model on Upper Awash Basin (UAB), Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Yunfeng Hu & Batu Nacun, 2018. "An Analysis of Land-Use Change and Grassland Degradation from a Policy Perspective in Inner Mongolia, China, 1990–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Jiangsu Li & Weihua Li & Bo Li & Liangrong Duan & Tianjiao Zhang & Qi Jia, 2022. "Construction Land Expansion of Resource-Based Cities in China: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Ge Shi & Peng Ye & Liang Ding & Agustin Quinones & Yang Li & Nan Jiang, 2019. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Land Use and Cover Change from 1990 to 2010: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Weijia Liang & Quan Quan & Bohua Wu & Shuhong Mo, 2023. "Response of Vegetation Dynamics in the Three-North Region of China to Climate and Human Activities from 1982 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Ruci Wang & Ahmed Derdouri & Yuji Murayama, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Simulation of Future Land Use/Cover Change Scenarios in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Jun Wang & Zhihua Wang & Hongbin Cheng & Junmei Kang & Xiaoliang Liu, 2022. "Land Cover Changing Pattern in Pre- and Post-Earthquake Affected Area from Remote Sensing Data: A Case of Lushan County, Sichuan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Bhanage Vinayak & Han Soo Lee & Shirishkumar Gedem, 2021. "Prediction of Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Mumbai City, India, Using Remote Sensing Data and a Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network-Based Markov Chain Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Jinquan Ai & Chao Zhang & Lijuan Chen & Dajun Li, 2020. "Mapping Annual Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Yangtze Estuary Region Using an Object-Based Classification Framework and Landsat Time Series Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Bonoua Faye & Guoming Du & Ru Zhang, 2022. "Efficiency Analysis of Land Use and the Degree of Coupling Link between Population Growth and Global Built-Up Area in the Subregion of West Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    11. Yanzhuo Liu & Shanshan Song & Chunjuan Bi & Junli Zhao & Di Xi & Ziqi Su, 2019. "Occurrence, Distribution and Risk Assessment of Mercury in Multimedia of Soil-Dust-Plants in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Yingen Hu & Ye Zhang & Xinli Ke, 2018. "Dynamics of Tradeoffs between Economic Benefits and Ecosystem Services due to Urban Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Xiaoping Zhou & Duanshuai Shen & Xiaokun Gu, 2022. "Influences of Land Policy on Urban Ecological Corridors Governance: A Case Study from Shanghai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Chunying Ning & Rajan Subedi & Lu Hao, 2023. "Land Use/Cover Change, Fragmentation, and Driving Factors in Nepal in the Last 25 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Roestamy, Martin & Martin, Abraham Yazdi & Rusli, Radif Khotamir & Fulazzaky, Mohamad Ali, 2022. "A review of the reliability of land bank institution in Indonesia for effective land management of public interest," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Khun La Yaung & Amnat Chidthaisong & Atsamon Limsakul & Pariwate Varnakovida & Can Trong Nguyen, 2021. "Land Use Land Cover Changes and Their Effects on Surface Air Temperature in Myanmar and Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Junmei Kang & Zhihua Wang & Hongbin Cheng & Jun Wang & Xiaoliang Liu, 2022. "Remote Sensing Land Use Evolution in Earthquake-Stricken Regions of Wenchuan County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Ge Shi & Nan Jiang & Yang Li & Bin He, 2018. "Analysis of the Dynamic Urban Expansion Based on Multi-Sourced Data from 1998 to 2013: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Chao Zhang & Shuai Zhong & Xue Wang & Lei Shen & Litao Liu & Yujie Liu, 2019. "Land Use Change in Coastal Cities during the Rapid Urbanization Period from 1990 to 2016: A Case Study in Ningbo City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Zhang, Yuzhi & Chen, Ruishan & Wang, Yao, 2020. "Tendency of land reclamation in coastal areas of Shanghai from 1998 to 2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1429-:d:911010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.