IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1399-d907170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential Responses of Dominant Plants to Grazing in Typical Temperate Grassland in Inner Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Dongli Wan

    (Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
    Practaculture and Grassland Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Yongqing Wan

    (College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China)

  • Yunfeng Wang

    (Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
    Practaculture and Grassland Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Tingting Yang

    (Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
    Practaculture and Grassland Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Fang Li

    (Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
    Practaculture and Grassland Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Wuriliga

    (Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
    Practaculture and Grassland Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010010, China)

  • Yong Ding

    (Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hohhot 010010, China
    Practaculture and Grassland Research Institute of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 010010, China)

Abstract

Leymus chinensis , Stipa grandis , Artemisia frigida , and Cleistogenes squarrosa are the dominant plant species in typical temperate grasslands in Xilingol. Intensive studies related to overgrazing, which resulted in a dominant plant shift, have been carried out in recent years, but the ways in which these four species respond to different grazing intensities remain elusive. In this study, the contents of primary metabolites, secondary metabolites, and phytohormones in the leaves of these species under five grazing intensities were assayed and compared. The results showed that A. frigida contained higher amounts of lignin, while C. squarrosa contained higher amounts of total flavonoids than the other species. Leymus chinensis showed a different accumulation of cellulose and tannin in response to grazing, compared with the other three species. Stipa grandis and A. frigida increased in soluble protein contents in response to different grazing treatments. In particular, the contents of phytohormones, such as abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and gibberellins, were markedly changed under grazing. Leymus chinensis exhibited different abscisic acid and gibberellins accumulation patterns compared with the other species, under the different grazing intensities. Patterns of salicylic acid accumulation were similar (except under light and moderate grazing intensities in A. frigida ) among the four species. The results indicated that the four species differed in adaptive strategies to cope with the different grazing intensities, and phytohormones played important roles in coordinating the regulation of their growth and grazing tolerance. This study provides a foundation for elucidating the mechanisms of overgrazing-induced degradation of the Xilingol grassland.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongli Wan & Yongqing Wan & Yunfeng Wang & Tingting Yang & Fang Li & Wuriliga & Yong Ding, 2022. "Differential Responses of Dominant Plants to Grazing in Typical Temperate Grassland in Inner Mongolia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1399-:d:907170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1399-:d:907170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.