Author
Listed:
- Sen Xu
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Shuanglin Chen
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Ziwu Guo
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Yuyou He
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Liting Yang
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Yawen Dong
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Yanyan Xie
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
- Jingrun Zhang
(Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China)
Abstract
Sheath blades are the first bamboo organ exposed to sunlight after shoots initially emerge. However, it remains uncertain whether sheath blades affect bamboo shoot growth and quality. Accordingly, this study explores variations in Phyllostachys violascens shoot growth and quality, comparing natural growth conditions to periodic sheath blade removal treatments. Results show that sheath blade removal and interactions between sheath blade removal and duration had no significant effect on the morphology, protein nutritional quality, or value of bamboo shoots. However, the length of bamboo shoot was significantly lower 4 d after treatment compared to 4 d after natural growth conditions. Moreover, sheath blade removal did have a significant effect on soluble sugar, total acid, oxalic acid, tannic acid, and cellulose content as well as sugar–acid ratios of bamboo shoots, while having no significant effect on the content and proportion of amino acid flavor compounds. Interactions between sheath blade removal and duration only had a significant effect on total acid and sugar–acid ratios. Soluble sugar, oxalic acid, tannic acid, and sugar–acid ratios increased significantly 2 d after sheath blade removal, while total acid and cellulose content decreased significantly. Lastly, soluble sugar content and sugar–acid ratios increased significantly 4 d after sheath blade removal. Findings from this study indicate that sheath blades affect shoot quality, particularly taste, which is mainly driven by carbon metabolism, but the effect of nitrogen metabolism was not obvious. This study gave a new perspective for revealing the formation mechanism of shoot quality, and also provided possible methods of improvement for the shoot quality.
Suggested Citation
Sen Xu & Shuanglin Chen & Ziwu Guo & Yuyou He & Liting Yang & Yawen Dong & Yanyan Xie & Jingrun Zhang, 2022.
"Effect of Sheath Blade Removal on Phyllostachys violascens Shoot Quality,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1396-:d:906960
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1396-:d:906960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.