Author
Listed:
- Shengyu Li
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
- Jiali Zeng
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
- Zhao Zheng
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China
School of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
- Qi Zhou
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
- Shaona Chen
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
- Yixiong Zheng
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
- Xiaorong Wan
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
- Bin Yang
(Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Research and Development of Crop Germplasm Resources, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou 510225, China)
Abstract
Seed vigor is an important agronomic trait, and wide variation exists among peanut accessions. However, the detailed regulatory mechanisms underlying differences in seed vigor between varieties are not known in peanut yet. Here, we performed a comparative transcriptome analysis of germinating seeds in two contrasting peanut accessions, namely A86 (high-vigor variety) and A279 (low-vigor variety). A total of 583 and 860 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified at two imbibition stages between A86 and A279, respectively. Pathway enrichment tests highlighted the cell wall remodeling-, hormone signaling-, transcriptional regulation-, and oxidative stress-related DEGs, which may explain to a certain extent the difference in seed vigor between the two cultivars. Among them, the largest number of cell wall remodeling-related DEGs were extensions followed by cellulose synthases, fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins, polygalacturonases, expansins, and pectinesterases and the hormone signaling-related DEGs belonged mainly to the auxin and ethylene signaling pathway. The majority of transcriptional regulation-related DEGs were MYB, FAR1, and bHLH transcription factors, and the oxidative stress-related DEGs were mainly peroxidases. Further physiological analyses indicated that differences in seed vigor between A86 and A279 may be associated with differences in the ROS-scavenging abilities mediated by peroxidases. Moreover, we identified 16 DEGs homologous to known Arabidopsis regulators of seed dormancy and germination, suggesting that these DEGs would play similar functional roles during peanut seed germination. Our results not only provide important insights into the difference in seed vigor between varieties, but offer candidate genes that are worth investigating in future studies.
Suggested Citation
Shengyu Li & Jiali Zeng & Zhao Zheng & Qi Zhou & Shaona Chen & Yixiong Zheng & Xiaorong Wan & Bin Yang, 2022.
"Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Mechanisms Underlying Differential Seed Vigor in Two Contrasting Peanut Genotypes,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1355-:d:903955
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1355-:d:903955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.