IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i8p1276-d894319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impacts of Rapid Urbanization on Farmland Marginalization: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China

Author

Listed:
  • Junna Liu

    (School of Public Policy, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221043, China)

  • Siyan Zeng

    (School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310024, China)

  • Jing Ma

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Yuanyuan Chang

    (School of Public Policy, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221043, China)

  • Yan Sun

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Fu Chen

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

Abstract

Farmland is the most precious natural resource and the primary source of food for human beings. Urbanization not only occupies a large amount of farmland spatially, but also economically squeezes agricultural production, resulting in farmland marginalization and causing serious threats to food security. However, the manner in which rapid urbanization drives farmland marginalization in surrounding areas and the factors that might play a dominant role in this process remain elusive. Therefore, the present study considered rapidly urbanized regions of 128 county-level units in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) of China from 2000 to 2020 as the study area. Methods such as spatial autocorrelation analysis, hotspot analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to explore the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and the driving factors of farmland marginalization. The results showed that: (i) the marginalization ratio of farmland in YRD from 2000 to 2020 was 31.34%, with a distinctly increasing trend, generally high in the central and southern and low in the north areas; (ii) marginalization exhibited different spatial agglomeration under different influencing factors: the economy-induced marginalization ratio was 23.19%, playing a dominant role, in general, distributed as high in the middle and low on the sides, while the nature-induced marginalization ratio was 8.15%, and in general, the spatial pattern shifted from discrete- to a clear- distribution of high in the south and low in the north; and, (iii) farmland area per capita, total power of agricultural machinery, GDP per capita and government farmland subsidies were the main factors driving farmland marginalization. In addition, nature-induced marginalization was primarily driven by economic level and topographical conditions, whereas economy-induced marginalization was primarily driven by production conditions. We suggest that in the future, corresponding policies and measures should be established to reduce farmland marginalization in rapidly urbanized areas and to ensure food security.

Suggested Citation

  • Junna Liu & Siyan Zeng & Jing Ma & Yuanyuan Chang & Yan Sun & Fu Chen, 2022. "The Impacts of Rapid Urbanization on Farmland Marginalization: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1276-:d:894319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Hualin & Lu, Hua, 2017. "Impact of land fragmentation and non-agricultural labor supply on circulation of agricultural land management rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 355-364.
    2. Ma, Li & Long, Hualou & Tu, Shuangshuang & Zhang, Yingnan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2020. "Farmland transition in China and its policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Abdollahzadeh, Gholamhossein & Azadi, Hossein & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Sharif & Jahangir, Leila & Janečková, Kristina & Sklenička, Petr & Tan, Rong & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Landholders’ perception of conversion of steep lands to orchard schemes: Land use policy implications in North Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Meijia Xiao & Qingwen Zhang & Liqin Qu & Hafiz Athar Hussain & Yuequn Dong & Li Zheng, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Changes and the Driving Forces of Sloping Farmland Areas in the Sichuan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Han Huang & Yang Zhou & Mingjie Qian & Zhaoqi Zeng, 2021. "Land Use Transition and Driving Forces in Chinese Loess Plateau: A Case Study from Pu County, Shanxi Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. He, Yafen & Xie, Hualin & Peng, Chaozhong, 2020. "Analyzing the behavioural mechanism of farmland abandonment in the hilly mountainous areas in China from the perspective of farming household diversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Tiechou Shi & Xiubin Li & Liangjie Xin & Xiaohong Xu, 2016. "Analysis of Farmland Abandonment at Parcel Level: A Case Study in the Mountainous Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Shi, Tiechou & Li, Xiubin & Xin, Liangjie & Xu, Xiaohong, 2018. "The spatial distribution of farmland abandonment and its influential factors at the township level: A case study in the mountainous area of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 510-520.
    9. Marco Stampini & Benjamin Davis, 2009. "Does nonagricultural labor relax farmers’ credit constraints? Evidence from longitudinal data for Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(2), pages 177-188, March.
    10. Yahui Wang & Liangjie Xin & Haozhe Zhang & Yuanqing Li, 2019. "An Estimation of the Extent of Rent-Free Farmland Transfer and Its Driving Forces in Rural China: A Multilevel Logit Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bonoua Faye & Guoming Du & Edmée Mbaye & Chang’an Liang & Tidiane Sané & Ruhao Xue, 2023. "Assessing the Spatial Agricultural Land Use Transition in Thiès Region, Senegal, and Its Potential Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Shabnum Shaheen & Nidaa Harun & Raina Ijaz & Naila Mukhtar & Muhammad Ashfaq & Fozia Bibi & Muhammad Ali & Zaheer Abbas & Zaryab Khalid, 2023. "Sustainability Issues in Conservation of Traditional Medicinal Herbs and Their Associated Knowledge: A Case Study of District Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Yu, Zhenning & She, Shuoqi & Xia, Chuyu & Luo, Jiaojiao, 2023. "How to solve the dilemma of China’s land fallow policy: Application of voluntary bidding mode in the Yangtze River Delta of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quanfeng Li & Zhe Dong & Guoming Du & Aizheng Yang, 2021. "Spatial Differentiation of Cultivated Land Use Intensification in Village Settings: A Survey of Typical Chinese Villages," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Chen, Qianru & Wu, Manyu & Xie, Hualin, 2023. "Tillage conditions or social economy? An analysis of the dominant driving force of farmland marginalization from the farmers' perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Yemei Li & Yanfei Shan & Ying Chen, 2021. "Analysis of Farmland Abandonment and Government Supervision Traps in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Xinyao Li & Lingzhi Wang & Bryan Pijanowski & Lingpeng Pan & Hichem Omrani & Anqi Liang & Yi Qu, 2022. "The Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Transition Mode of Recessive Cultivated Land Use Morphology in the Huaibei Region of the Jiangsu Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & He, Huiyan & Xin, Liangjie & Tan, Minghong, 2020. "How reliable are cultivated land assets as social security for Chinese farmers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Rural land system reforms in China: History, issues, measures and prospects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Yue Zhang & Guihua Liu & Zhixing Ma & Xin Deng & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2022. "The Influence of Land Attachment on Land Abandonment from the Perspective of Generational Difference: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Qian, Long & Lu, Hua & Gao, Qiang & Lu, Hualiang, 2022. "Household-owned farm machinery vs. outsourced machinery services: The impact of agricultural mechanization on the land leasing behavior of relatively large-scale farmers in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Yahui Wang & Qingyuan Yang & Liangjie Xin & Jingyu Zhang, 2019. "Does the New Rural Pension System Promote Farmland Transfer in the Context of Aging in Rural China: Evidence from the CHARLS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Qianru Chen, 2022. "Analyzing Farmers’ Cultivated-Land-Abandonment Behavior: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and a Structural Equation Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Xue Wang, 2022. "Changes in Cultivated Land Loss and Landscape Fragmentation in China from 2000 to 2020," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Lili Chen & Hongsheng Chen & Chaohui Zou & Ye Liu, 2021. "The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Rural Households’ Income Structure in the Context of Household Differentiation: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    14. Heyuan You & Shenyan Wu & Xin Wu & Xuxu Guo & Yan Song, 2021. "The underlying influencing factors of farmland transfer in urbanizing China: implications for sustainable land use goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8722-8745, June.
    15. Hengfei Song & Liangjie Xin & Xiubin Li & Xue Wang & Yufeng He & Wen Song, 2022. "Can Livestock Raising Alleviate Farmland Abandonment?—Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Wei Song, 2019. "Mapping Cropland Abandonment in Mountainous Areas Using an Annual Land-Use Trajectory Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Yanwei Wang & Wei Song, 2021. "Mapping Abandoned Cropland Changes in the Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & Lu, Dan & Yan, Jianzhong, 2020. "Evaluating the impact of land fragmentation on the cost of agricultural operation in the southwest mountainous areas of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Luo, Tao & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Huang, Ruyi & Chen, Qiu & Mei, Zili & Pan, Junting & Liu, Hongbin, 2020. "Analysis of revolution in decentralized biogas facilities caused by transition in Chinese rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Tran, Minh Chau & Gan, Christopher & Hu, Baiding, 2014. "Credit Constraints and Impact on Farm Household Welfare: Evidence from Vietnam’s North Central Coast region," 2014 Conference, August 28-29, 2014, Nelson, New Zealand 187495, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1276-:d:894319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.