IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i8p1074-d869015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Honey Bee Foraging Decisions Influenced by Pear Volatiles

Author

Listed:
  • Wenting Su

    (College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Weihua Ma

    (College of Horticulture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China)

  • Qi Zhang

    (College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Xiao Hu

    (Key Laboratory for Insect-Pollinator Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China)

  • Guiling Ding

    (Key Laboratory for Insect-Pollinator Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China)

  • Yusuo Jiang

    (College of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Jiaxing Huang

    (Key Laboratory for Insect-Pollinator Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100093, China)

Abstract

The interactions between plants and pollinators are complex. Flower volatiles as special olfactory cues could influence the foraging choices of pollinators. Here, we conducted bioassays to evaluate the role of flower volatiles on the attraction of honey bees (native Apis cerana and exotic Apis mellifera ) to pears (native Pyrus bretschneideri and exotic Pyrus communis ). Chemical and electrophysiological approaches were used to determine flower volatiles and evaluate the antennal responses of honey bees to volatiles from pear flowers. Bioassays demonstrated that flower volatiles were crucial for the attraction of honey bees to pear flowers; honey bees preferred to forage on P. communis flowers ( p > 0.05), with approximately 64.37 ± 0.02% ( A. mellifera ) and 62.10 ± 0.02% ( A. cerana ) foraging on P. communis . Flowers of P. communis and P. bretschneideri yielded 27 and 31 compounds, respectively, with 17 of them being common. Honey bee antennae responded to 16 chemicals, including 5 contained in both pear species: 1-nonanol, linalool, methyl 2-hydroxy-3-methylpentanoate, methyl L-isoleucinate, and α-farnesene. In addition, there were 8 electrophysiologically active compounds in P. bretschneideri : methyl L-valine ester, benzaldehyde, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, isophorone, 2-methyl octane, longicyclene, longifolene, and caryophyllene; and 3 electrophysiologically active compounds in P. communis : β-ocimene, 4-oxoisophorone and lilac alcohol D. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the significant impact of pear flower volatiles on honey bee foraging choices. This knowledge provides a basis for the selection of honey bees for pear pollination and lays a foundation for further study of the chemical communication of pear attractiveness to honey bees.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenting Su & Weihua Ma & Qi Zhang & Xiao Hu & Guiling Ding & Yusuo Jiang & Jiaxing Huang, 2022. "Honey Bee Foraging Decisions Influenced by Pear Volatiles," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1074-:d:869015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulo Milet-Pinheiro & Manfred Ayasse & Clemens Schlindwein & Heidi E. M. Dobson & Stefan Dötterl, 2012. "Host location by visual and olfactory floral cues in an oligolectic bee: innate and learned behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 531-538.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bartosz Piechowicz & Anna Koziorowska, 2023. "The Pollinators in Agricultural Ecosystems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-3, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:8:p:1074-:d:869015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.