IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i2p281-d750932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Peeling, Film Packaging, and Cold Storage on the Quality of Minimally Processed Prickly Pears ( Opuntia ficus-indica L. Mill.)

Author

Listed:
  • Goretti L. Díaz-Delgado

    (Departamento de Producción Vegetal en Zonas Tropicales y Subtropicales, Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias, 38270 Tenerife, Spain)

  • Elena M. Rodríguez-Rodríguez

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38296 Tenerife, Spain)

  • Eva Dorta

    (Departamento de Producción Vegetal en Zonas Tropicales y Subtropicales, Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias, 38270 Tenerife, Spain)

  • M. Gloria Lobo

    (Departamento de Producción Vegetal en Zonas Tropicales y Subtropicales, Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias, 38270 Tenerife, Spain)

Abstract

Opuntia species exhibit beneficial properties when used to treat chronic diseases, particularly obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer; however, the presence of spines and glochids in the species’ skin that easily stick into consumers’ fingers has limited their consumption. For this study, white and orange Opuntia ficus-indica fruits from the Canary Islands (Spain) were minimally processed, packed in a passive atmosphere, and stored at 7 °C. The effects of peeling (by hand or with an electric peeler) and two micro-perforated films (90PPlus and 180PPlus) were evaluated. Changes in the quality parameters, gas composition, bioactive compounds, sensory features, and microbial safety of fresh-cut prickly pears were examined during 10 days of cold storage. Both varieties, hand-peeled and electrically peeled, were microbiologically safe (aerobic mesophiles < 7 log(CFU/g fresh weight)) and retained suitable nutritional quality after 8 days of storage. The yield was greater when fruits were electrically peeled than hand-peeled (70.7% vs. 44.0% and 66.5% vs. 40.8% for white and orange fruits, respectively). The concentrations of oxygen and carbon dioxide were above 15% and below 7.5%, respectively, in all the treatments over the shelf life. TSS decreased during storage independently of variety, peeling method, or film. Fructose was the most abundant sugar, followed by glucose and sucrose. The electric peeling machine improved not only the edible part of the fruit but also the contents of bioactive compounds, such as ascorbic acid and phenolic compounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Goretti L. Díaz-Delgado & Elena M. Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Eva Dorta & M. Gloria Lobo, 2022. "Effects of Peeling, Film Packaging, and Cold Storage on the Quality of Minimally Processed Prickly Pears ( Opuntia ficus-indica L. Mill.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:281-:d:750932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/281/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/281/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sofia Trindade & Maria Inês Rouxinol & Ana Cristina Agulheiro-Santos, 2023. "Opuntia ficus-indica L. Fruits Cold Storage Using Different Packaging Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Goretti L. Díaz-Delgado & Elena M. Rodríguez-Rodríguez & M. Pilar Cano & M. Gloria Lobo, 2024. "Storage Conditions of Refrigerated Prickly Pears in Small Processing Industries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:281-:d:750932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.