IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i2p266-d748516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Grass Silage Additive Type and Barley Grain Preservation Method on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Community and Milk Production of Dairy Cows

Author

Listed:
  • Marketta Rinne

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)

  • Marcia Franco

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)

  • Ilma Tapio

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)

  • Tomasz Stefański

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)

  • Ali-Reza Bayat

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)

  • Päivi Mäntysaari

    (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland)

Abstract

Grass was ensiled using an acid-based additive (AS) or homofermentative lactic acid bacteria (IS). In addition, barley grain was either dried (DB) or crimped and ensiled (EB). The feeds were fed as total mixed rations (TMR) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement to 16 Nordic Red dairy cows in four replicated Latin squares. The differences in the fermentation quality of the two grass silages were unexpectedly small. Dry matter intake was higher ( p < 0.01) for cows fed AS than those fed IS but was not affected by barley preservation method. Ruminal molar proportion of butyrate tended to be higher in cows fed AS rather than IS ( p < 0.10) in expense of acetate ( p < 0.05). Barley preservation method did not affect rumen fermentation but modulated rumen bacterial community composition. Milk production was not affected by silage additive but tended ( p < 0.10) to be higher (39.6 vs. 39.0 kg/d) for cows fed DB rather than EB. However, barley type did not affect energy corrected milk yield due to a tendency ( p < 0.10) for higher milk fat content of cows fed EB rather than DB. Milk fat yield tended ( p < 0.10) to be higher for AS-fed cows than IS-fed cows, and milk protein yield was higher for cows receiving DB rather than EB. The AS resulted in more aerobically stable TMR than IS and a minor advantage was found for DB compared to EB.

Suggested Citation

  • Marketta Rinne & Marcia Franco & Ilma Tapio & Tomasz Stefański & Ali-Reza Bayat & Päivi Mäntysaari, 2022. "Effects of Grass Silage Additive Type and Barley Grain Preservation Method on Rumen Fermentation, Microbial Community and Milk Production of Dairy Cows," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:266-:d:748516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/266/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/266/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:266-:d:748516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.