IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i2p255-d746262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pathogenic Interactions between Macrophomina phaseolina and Magnaporthiopsis maydis in Mutually Infected Cotton Sprouts

Author

Listed:
  • Ofir Degani

    (Plant Sciences Department, Migal—Galilee Research Institute, Tarshish 2, Kiryat Shmona 11016, Israel
    Faculty of Sciences, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Tel-Hai 12210, Israel)

  • Paz Becher

    (Plant Sciences Department, Migal—Galilee Research Institute, Tarshish 2, Kiryat Shmona 11016, Israel
    Faculty of Sciences, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Tel-Hai 12210, Israel)

  • Asaf Gordani

    (Plant Sciences Department, Migal—Galilee Research Institute, Tarshish 2, Kiryat Shmona 11016, Israel
    Faculty of Sciences, Tel-Hai College, Upper Galilee, Tel-Hai 12210, Israel)

Abstract

The soil fungus Macrophomina phaseolina , the charcoal rot disease agent, poses a major threat to cotton fields. In Israel, highly infected areas are also inhabited by the maize pathogen Magnaporthiopsis maydis . This study reveals the relationships between the two pathogens and their impact on cotton sprouts. Infecting the soil 14 days before sowing (DBS) with each pathogen or with M. phaseolina before M. maydis caused a strong inhibition (up to 50–65%) of the sprouts’ development and survival, accompanied by each pathogen’s high DNA levels in the plants. However, combined or sequence infection with M. maydis first led to two distinct scenarios. This pathogen acted as a beneficial protective endophyte in one experiment, leading to significantly high emergence and growth indices of the plants and a ca. 10-fold reduction in M. phaseolina DNA in the sprouts’ roots. In contrast, M. maydis showed strong virulence potential (with 43–69% growth and survival suppression) in the other experiment, proving its true nature as an opportunist. Interestingly, soil inoculation with M. phaseolina first, 14 DBS (but not at sowing), shielded the plants from M. maydis ’ devastating impact. The results suggest that the two pathogens restrict each other, and this equilibrium may lead to a moderate disease burst.

Suggested Citation

  • Ofir Degani & Paz Becher & Asaf Gordani, 2022. "Pathogenic Interactions between Macrophomina phaseolina and Magnaporthiopsis maydis in Mutually Infected Cotton Sprouts," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:255-:d:746262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/255/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/2/255/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:255-:d:746262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.