Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Awais
(Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering & Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
School of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
- Wei Li
(Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering & Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
- Sajjad Hussain
(Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment & Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)
- Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Cheema
(Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, PMAS-Arid Agricultural University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
NCIB Project, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan)
- Weiguo Li
(Institute of Agricultural Information, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China)
- Rui Song
(Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering & Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
- Chenchen Liu
(Research Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering & Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)
Abstract
Remotely-sensed data are a source of rich information and are valuable for precision agricultural tasks such as soil quality, plant disease analysis, crop stress assessment, and allowing for better management. It is necessary to validate the accuracy of land surface temperature (LST) that is acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and satellite-based remote sensing and verify these data by a comparison with in situ LST. Comprehensive studies at the field scale are still needed to understand the suitability of UAV imagery and resolution, for which ground measurement is used as a reference. In this study, we examined the accuracy of surface temperature data that were obtained from a thermal infrared (TIR) sensor placed on a UAV. Accordingly, we evaluated the LST from the Landsat 8 satellite for the same specific periods. We used contact thermometers to measure LSTs in situ for comparison and evaluation. Between 18 August and 2 September 2020, UAV imagery and in situ measurements were carried out. The effectiveness of high-resolution UAVs imagery and of Landsat 8 imagery was evaluated by considering a regression and correlation coefficient analysis. The data from the satellite photography was compared to the UAV imagery using statistical metrics after it had been pre-processed. Ground control points (GCPs) were collected to create a rigorous geo-referenced dataset of UAV imagery that could be compared to the geo-referenced satellite and aerial imagery. The UAV TIR LST showed higher accuracy ( R 2 0.89, 0.90, root-mean-square error (RMSE) 1.07, 0.70 °C) than the Landsat LST accuracy ( R 2 0.70, 0.73, (RMSE) 0.78 °C). The relationship between LST and the available soil water content (SWC) was also observed. The results suggested that the UAV-SMC correlation was negative (−0.85) for the image of DOY 230, while this value remains approximately constant (−0.86) for the DOY 245. Our results showed that satellite imagery that was coherent and correlated with UAV images could be useful to assess the general conditions of the field while the UAV favors localized circumscribed areas that the lowest resolution of satellites missed. Accordingly, our results could help with urban area and environmental planning decisions that take into account the thermal environment.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Awais & Wei Li & Sajjad Hussain & Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Cheema & Weiguo Li & Rui Song & Chenchen Liu, 2022.
"Comparative Evaluation of Land Surface Temperature Images from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Satellite Observation for Agricultural Areas Using In Situ Data,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:184-:d:736117
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:184-:d:736117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.