Author
Listed:
- Dariusz Górski
(Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland)
- Renata Gaj
(Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Environmental Biogeochemistry, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 71F, 60-625 Poznań, Poland)
- Agnieszka Ulatowska
(Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland)
- Wojciech Miziniak
(Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland)
Abstract
A two-factor field experiment using sugar beet was conducted in 2016–2018 at Sokołowo in Poland (ϕ 53°5′16.05″ N, λ 19°6′21.07″ E), in a strip-plot arrangement with four replicates. Strip-till (ST) was compared to conventional tillage (CT) using four commercial sugar beet varieties (Alegra, Armesa, Contenta, Julius). In each study year, the experiment was established on lessivé soils developed from heavy loamy sand. The soil was rich in available macronutrients, while its reaction was neutral. The plant density, sugar yield, roots quality, and technological sugar yield were determined. A significant increase was found in root yield (6.6%) and, accordingly, in technological sugar yield (8.2%) in ST treatment relative to CT. Consistently, an increasing trend was observed for the root sugar content (0.21%). For the varieties examined, no preferences were observed in respect of tillage systems applied. The direction of changes in root yield, sugar content, and technological sugar yield remained constant regardless of the variety, tillage system, or the study year. The contents of potassium, sodium, and α-amino-nitrogen responded equally to both the variety and study year; however, the direction of changes in the above parameters was ambiguous and varied among the study years.
Suggested Citation
Dariusz Górski & Renata Gaj & Agnieszka Ulatowska & Wojciech Miziniak, 2022.
"Effect of Strip-Till and Variety on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet against Conventional Tillage,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:166-:d:732498
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:166-:d:732498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.