IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i1p69-d718684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Water Environment Simulation Study of Two Typical Models with BMPs in a Karst Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Zhang

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Geographic Information System, College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
    Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Peiqi Zhang

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Geographic Information System, College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
    Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Yongyu Song

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Resource Environment and Geographic Information System, College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
    Beijing Laboratory of Water Resources Security, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

Carbonate rocks are widely distributed in southwest China, forming a unique karst landscape. The Lijiang River Basin provides a typical example of an area with concentrated karst. Research on the laws of hydrology and water quality migration in the Lijiang River Basin is important for the management of the water resources of Guilin City and similar areas. In this study, we combined three meteorological data with the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model and the hydrological simulation program-Fortran (HSPF) model to simulate the hydrological and water quality processes in the Lijiang River Basin separately. We chose the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient, coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR), and mean absolute error (MAE) as the metrics used to evaluate the models. The results, combined with the time-series process lines, indicated that the SWAT model provides a more accurate performance than the HSPF model in streamflow, ammonia nitrogen (NH 3 -N), and dissolved oxygen (DO) simulations. In addition, we divided the karst and non-karst areas, and we analyzed the differences between them in water balance, sediment transport, and pollution load. We further identified the key source areas of pollution load in the Lijiang River Basin, evaluated the pollution reduction effect of best management practices (BMPs) on surface source pollution, and proposed some pollution control countermeasures. Each scenario, especially returning farmland to forest and creating vegetation buffer zones, reduces the NH 3 -N and DO pollution load.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Zhang & Peiqi Zhang & Yongyu Song, 2022. "Comparative Water Environment Simulation Study of Two Typical Models with BMPs in a Karst Basin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:69-:d:718684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/69/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/69/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:69-:d:718684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.