Author
Listed:
- Yanliang Sun
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China)
- Xuzhe Wang
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China)
- Chunhui Ma
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China)
- Qianbing Zhang
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China)
Abstract
Alfalfa productivity and cold resistance in different regions are influenced by the fall-dormancy level of alfalfa. However, it is unclear whether the stoichiometric characteristics and nutrient resorption efficiency in alfalfa leaves also vary with the fall-dormancy level. In order to further understand the differences in nutrient absorption and requirements of different fall-dormant alfalfa, we conducted field trials on 30 different fall-dormancy alfalfa cultivars for 2 consecutive years in 2020 and 2021. We investigated the concentrations of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in mature and senescent alfalfa leaves; nutrient stoichiometry ratios; and the coupling relationship between nutrient reabsorption efficiency and dry matter yield. The differences in nutrient reabsorption, fall dormancy, and dry matter yield of different fall-dormant alfalfa, and the correlation between indicators were utilized to further analyze the regulatory mechanisms of nutrient reabsorption in different fall-dormancy alfalfa varieties. The results demonstrated that the nitrogen reabsorption efficiency (NRE) and phosphorus reabsorption efficiency (PRE) of leaves increased first and then decreased with the increase in fall dormancy, whereas the carbon reabsorption efficiency (CRE) showed the reverse tendency. Different fall-dormancy alfalfa varieties significantly affected the dry matter yield and nutrient absorption in the first cut, while the last cut had the lowest variable coefficient and impact. There was a significant decrease in the over-winter survival rate of alfalfa as the fall-dormancy level increased, whereas the over-summer survival rate was less affected by the fall-dormancy level. As the growth year increased, there was a significant decrease in the over-winter survival rate. Among mature leaves, the NRE and PRE showed a significant positive correlation with the C concentration, while they showed a significant negative association with the N and P concentrations. In the same cut, the dry matter yield decreased with the increase in CRE but increased with the increases in NRE and PRE, while there was no significant trend in dry matter yield and nutrient resorption efficiency (NuRE) between different cuts. Taken together, the alfalfa survival rate and dry matter yield were relatively better in the moderate fall-dormancy (fall-dormancy level, FD = 4, 5) types and fall-dormancy (FD = 3) type, with a corresponding increase in the reabsorption requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2154-:d:1003335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.