IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i11p1954-d978247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Compaction under Different Traction Resistance Conditions—A Case Study in North Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Kaihua Liu

    (Department of Land, Environment Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Marco Benetti

    (Department of Land, Environment Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Marco Sozzi

    (Department of Land, Environment Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Franco Gasparini

    (Department of Land, Environment Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Luigi Sartori

    (Department of Land, Environment Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
    NEOS SRL, Spin-Off of the University of Padova, 35129 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Tractive efficiency is essential in tillage operations to optimise traction performance. In this field experiment, the tractor performance was measured under different traction resistance conditions. This study quantified the soil stress, soil bulk density, soil moisture, soil cone index, soil surface disturbance, rolling resistance and slip rate under different numbers of passes and traction conditions. The actual power used under different soil and traction conditions was collected. Fuel consumption and savings were calculated between uncompacted soil, compacted soil and the permanent traffic lane. The results show that soil stress increases in each location as traction and the number of passes increase. Soil’s physical properties increase, such as the soil bulk density, soil cone index and soil surface disturbance. Additionally, the slip rate increases with traction in each soil condition as uncompacted soil, compacted soil and the permanent traffic lane. The results show that the permanent traffic lane has a lower slip rate under different traction conditions than the uncompacted and compacted soil. Furthermore, the permanent traffic lane has less energy consumption with the same traction resistance. The permanent traffic lane saved 25.50%, 29.23% and 42.34% fuel compared to the uncompacted field in 7.85, 14.71 and 24.52 kN traction conditions, respectively. Our results confirm that dynamic factors such as traction and rolling resistance should be considered in soil compaction research rather than static weight only. In practice, the controlled traffic farming (CTF) system or driving the tractor more frequently on the permanent traffic lane should be considered to improve working efficiency and reduce energy consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaihua Liu & Marco Benetti & Marco Sozzi & Franco Gasparini & Luigi Sartori, 2022. "Soil Compaction under Different Traction Resistance Conditions—A Case Study in North Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:11:p:1954-:d:978247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/11/1954/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/11/1954/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekinci, Şerafettin & Çarman, Kazım & Kahramanlı, Humar, 2015. "Investigation and modeling of the tractive performance of radial tires using off-road vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1953-1963.
    2. Kingwell, Ross & Fuchsbichler, Amy, 2011. "The whole-farm benefits of controlled traffic farming: An Australian appraisal," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(7), pages 513-521, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaihua Liu & Ahmed Kayad & Marco Sozzi & Luigi Sartori & Francesco Marinello, 2023. "Headland and Field Edge Performance Assessment Using Yield Maps and Sentinel-2 Images," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graeme J. Doole & Alvaro J. Romera & Alfredo A. Adler, 2012. "A Mathematical Optimisation Model of a New Zealand Dairy Farm: The Integrated Dairy Enterprise (IDEA) Framework," Working Papers in Economics 12/01, University of Waikato.
    2. Ross Kingwell, 2021. "Making Agriculture Carbon Neutral Amid a Changing Climate: The Case of South-Western Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Finlayson, John & Real, Daniel & Nordblom, Tom & Revell, Clinton & Ewing, Mike & Kingwell, Ross, 2012. "Farm level assessments of a novel drought tolerant forage: Tedera (Bituminaria bituminosa C.H. Stirt var. albomarginata)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 38-47.
    4. Volodymyr Bulgakov & Simone Pascuzzi & Valerii Adamchuk & Volodymyr Kuvachov & Ladislav Nozdrovicky, 2019. "Theoretical Study of Transverse Offsets of Wide Span Tractor Working Implements and Their Influence on Damage to Row Crops," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Kingwell, Ross, 2018. "The Rationale for Taxpayer Support for Primary Industry Research and Innovation in Western Australia," Working Papers 274837, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Kharel, S. & d'Abbadie, C. & Abadi, A. & Kingwell, R., 2022. "Reducing farming system emissions via spatial application of payoff functions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Pánková, Ludmila & Aulová, Renata & Jarolímek, Jan, 2020. "Economic Aspects of Precision Agriculture Systems," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(3), September.
    8. T. Šima & M. Dubeňová, 2013. "Effect of crop residues on CO2 flux in the CTF system during soil tillage by a disc harrow Lemken Rubin 9," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(SpecialIs), pages 15-21.
    9. Nordblom, Thomas L. & Hutchings, Timothy R. & Godfrey, Sosheel S. & Schefe, Cassandra R., 2021. "Precision variable rate nitrogen for dryland farming on waterlogging Riverine Plains of Southeast Australia?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Young, Michael & Young, John & Kingwell, Ross S. & Vercoe, Philip E., 2023. "Evaluation of the least cost option to manage pastures in a wet winter in south-eastern Australia," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 20(3), August.
    11. Barnes, A.P. & Soto, I. & Eory, V. & Beck, B. & Balafoutis, A. & Sánchez, B. & Vangeyte, J. & Fountas, S. & van der Wal, T. & Gómez-Barbero, M., 2019. "Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 163-174.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:11:p:1954-:d:978247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.