IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i10p1692-d942799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization Design and Test of Spike-Toothed Crop Divider

Author

Listed:
  • Zhengliang Ding

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Optimized Design for Modern Agricultural Equipment, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shaochun Ma

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Optimized Design for Modern Agricultural Equipment, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
    Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Jing Bai

    (Beijing Key Laboratory of Optimized Design for Modern Agricultural Equipment, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wenpeng Liang

    (Guangxi Agricultural Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanning 530007, China)

  • Xiadong Zhang

    (Guangxi Agricultural Machinery Research Institute Co., Ltd., Nanning 530007, China)

Abstract

The crop divider is a crucial component of the sugarcane chopper harvester that has an important effect on the lifting performance of lodged sugarcanes. However, tropical weather and climate result in severe sugarcane lodging, which seriously hinders the sugarcane lifting process. To improve the lifting performance of crop dividers, a variable-spiral spike-toothed crop divider was designed. Some structural parameters of the bench test were designed. In this study, the forward speed, the rotational speed of the scrolls, and the installation angle of the scrolls were selected as test factors and the lifting angle of the sugarcane was selected as the test index. Based on a single-factor test, we found the optimum range of these test factors: a forward speed of 0.4~0.8 m/s, a rotational speed of the inside scrolls of 100~140 r/min, and an installation angle of the inside scrolls of 55°~65°. An orthogonal test was conducted to identify the relationships of test index and test factors. The regression model was obtained by fitting the test data and the response surface was established to analysis the interaction of test factors. According to Design Expert 8.0.6, the optimal factor combination of parameters was: a forward speed was 0.74 m/s, a rotational speed of the inside scrolls of 134 r/min, and an installation angle of the inside scrolls of 63.5°. Finally, the regression model was verified by the bench test. The relative error of the regression model of the lifting angle was 4.94%, which showed that the regression model was reliable. This study is expected to provide valuable references for the design and improvement of crop dividers.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhengliang Ding & Shaochun Ma & Jing Bai & Wenpeng Liang & Xiadong Zhang, 2022. "Optimization Design and Test of Spike-Toothed Crop Divider," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1692-:d:942799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/10/1692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:10:p:1692-:d:942799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.