Author
Listed:
- Nur Azlin Razali
(Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Horticultural Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia)
- Steven A. Sargent
(Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Charles A. Sims
(Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Jeffrey K. Brecht
(Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Adrian D. Berry
(Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida/IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- Guiwen Cheng
(JBT Corporation, 400 Fairway Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801, USA)
Abstract
Pitaya is a non-climacteric fruit that has white or red flesh with numerous small, black seeds. It has a high moisture content; however, water loss during handling and storage negatively affects the fresh weight, firmness and appearance of the fruit, decreasing market value. Application of compatible postharvest coatings has been shown to benefit postharvest quality of many crops. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two commercial coatings on weight loss and quality of pitaya during storage. Pitaya fruit were commercially harvested and sorted for uniformity of size and freedom from defects. Fruit were briefly immersed in either a vegetable oil-based coating (VOC; Sta-Fresh ® 2981) or a carnauba-based coating (CC; Endura-Fresh™ 6100) according to manufacturer’s recommendations. Fruit immersed in tap water served as a control. Fruit were fan-dried at room temperature for 20 min, then stored at 7 °C with 85% relative humidity (RH) and evaluated for selected physical quality parameters each 5 days during 20 days. After each evaluation, fruit were peeled and frozen for later analysis of soluble solids content (SSC), total titratable acidity (TTA); on day 15 fresh samples were evaluated by an untrained consumer sensory panel. CC prevented exocarp shriveling for 15 days of storage, compared to uncoated pitaya (16.3% area affected); shriveling in VOC was intermediate and not significantly different from the other treatments. Mesocarp firmness remained constant throughout 15 days of storage regardless of treatment. Fruit exocarp h* angle increased slightly by day 20, becoming slightly less red, and there were no negative treatment effects for the other quality factors measured: SSC (11.33%), TTA (0.25%), weight loss (5.5%) or sensory evaluations (appearance, flavor, texture, firmness, and juiciness). After 20 days storage, appearance for fruit from all treatments was rated unacceptable due to development of anthracnose lesions. It was concluded that both CC and VOC maintained quality of pitaya for 15 days at 7 °C and 85% RH by delaying exocarp shriveling.
Suggested Citation
Nur Azlin Razali & Steven A. Sargent & Charles A. Sims & Jeffrey K. Brecht & Adrian D. Berry & Guiwen Cheng, 2021.
"Potential of Postharvest Coatings to Maintain Freshness of Red-Fleshed Pitaya ( Hylocereus costaricensis ),"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-10, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:892-:d:637094
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:11:y:2021:i:9:p:892-:d:637094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.